@a11375 I'll stick to statistics thank you very much. You just keep dreaming you know Peles the best that's why you come on his site.
Why don't you stick to Maradona sites where during his international career (77-94).
They win 1 in 7 Trophies with him in side 14% (High altitude advantage and cheating England and Germany). Corrupt 1st half decisions to prevent what should have been Belgiums final and Belgiums alone.
@a11375 Actually you are wrong about Pele not doing much in 1962. He actually scored against Mexico and created the other Overall 2goals+assists created.
This is as many as Maradona managed in 75% of his World Cups, so get your facts right!
Your OPINION about Pele also playing in poor sides is wrong.
Santos were the best team in the World during Peles era. However when he wasn't in the side during this time at the natioonal, intercontinental level they lost 23 of 48 games.
@a11375 i said peles day 50s and 60s not the 80s, but football ios softer now haha as players get more protected from bad tackles in the old days players could smash a player and get away with it.
maradona do it better
alevorsten 4 hours ago
Ronaldo
akmalsalomov 10 hours ago
only 1 word...
BRASILIAN! <3 Brasil <3
TiestosFan18 10 hours ago
ahora entiendo por q es el mejor del MUNDO.............
podre morir en paz despues de ver este video.
locoxcomentar 11 hours ago
Absolutely no doubts, Pelè is the best!!
sebavedele78 12 hours ago
@a11375 like I told you before Pele scored in every world cup, only Seeler has done that.
Pele scored against mexico a great goal and gave the assist for the other one. in the second match he got injured.
get your facts right!
sptwood05 12 hours ago
@a11375 I'll stick to statistics thank you very much. You just keep dreaming you know Peles the best that's why you come on his site.
Why don't you stick to Maradona sites where during his international career (77-94).
They win 1 in 7 Trophies with him in side 14% (High altitude advantage and cheating England and Germany). Corrupt 1st half decisions to prevent what should have been Belgiums final and Belgiums alone.
2. They win 3 in 4 trophies without him 75%.
Keep dreaming sunshine!
THEWARDSTER 14 hours ago
@a11375 From (59-69) they won countless trophies with Pele but were lost without. Their record was 71% better with him.
Source rsssf.brazil and Pele autobiography.Fill in the gaps of games missed.
Maradona added just 8% to his teams 82-92 FACT!
Source footballdatabase.eu Type Maradona fill gaps. Statistically Pele far superior with
1. Better team achievements FACT!
2. Better personal achievements FACT!
3. Missed more statistically from a wide data of games when not in side. FACT!
THEWARDSTER 14 hours ago
@a11375 Actually you are wrong about Pele not doing much in 1962. He actually scored against Mexico and created the other Overall 2goals+assists created.
This is as many as Maradona managed in 75% of his World Cups, so get your facts right!
Your OPINION about Pele also playing in poor sides is wrong.
Santos were the best team in the World during Peles era. However when he wasn't in the side during this time at the natioonal, intercontinental level they lost 23 of 48 games.
THEWARDSTER 14 hours ago
@a11375 i said peles day 50s and 60s not the 80s, but football ios softer now haha as players get more protected from bad tackles in the old days players could smash a player and get away with it.
G1S1W 1 day ago