And yes, it is hilarious when some lame "truther" gets pwned by a bunch of juvenile radio jocks. It's funny because you make butthurt youtube videos and cry because no one takes you seriously.
And it's always funny just because you're lame. There will be a tl;dr, smarter than thou rant replying to this. That will be funny to read, too.
Wow you 9/11 conspiratards argue like creationists. You heavily imply one thing, and then get all defensive when people see through your ruse. Then you just bring up irrelevant nonissues to back up your "point", you use ad hominems, argument from silence, and claim you're leaving the discussion when you're getting trounced, all because you can't accept the fact that MAYBE just MAYBE the big scary government you hate so much wasn't involved in some hollywood-type conspiracy.
No reason to suspect a conspiracy?? Why haven't we had a real criminal investigation?? If the 9/11 commission was not created to assign blame as they have officially stated and clearly failed to do, then who is responsible for finding the real perpetrators?? To claim there is no evidence of a cover up or gov. involvement is embarrassing. Demand a criminal investigation, if not for your OWN SAFETY, do it for HUMAN JUSTICE!!
looks, it's obvious that you spend alot of time arguing with people about this on the net.. so much, that you dedicate your entire bio on your profile to bragging about your deeds.
it is clear that we won't get anywhere with this conversation.. (it's hard to when your opponent uses innuendo and strawmen as his main tactic)
I wish you the best.. good luck peddling your pharmaceuticals.
with that said, I never said they believed in a conspiracy.. NEVER.. when you insist that is what I mean.. it is your attempt to set up a strawman. I said they felt they were lied to, which is what they said.
now, it very well may be that their statements lead people to consider conspiracy theories, but that is the fault of the commission for not being through.. it isn't the American publics fault that they didn't "tied up all the loose ends"
"You've just accused the FAA and NORAD of complicity in a coverup"
I did no such thing.. I said "_If they (the commission) were being lied to_, then the commissions findings are false."
maybe you should look up the meaning of the word IF.
If they were being lied to, then their findings are false. i have said this the whole time. you insist of various tactics to try and prove me wrong mainly strawmen. but you cant deny the fact that the commissioners felt they were lied to.
Actually whats a strawman arguement is you using these people who have nothing to do with the twoof movement nor do they have any reason to suspect a conspiracy as your back up.
let me take the time to point out that you've already backed out of defending several of your points, essentially conceding them, but for some reason you just refuse to realize that this article doesnt really support you. You've just accused the FAA and NORAD of complicity in a coverup... with no evidence!
And yet they relied on false data to come to their conclusion. The dictabelt tape that determined that there were more gunshots fired was found to not be anywhere near dealey plaza essentially proving all of those conspiracy theorists wrong.
In the end JFK was more then likely shot by Oswald.
However for someone jaqing off like you claim to be, you have already come to your forgone conclusions and sold yourself out as ... indeed... a twoofer.
And yes, it is hilarious when some lame "truther" gets pwned by a bunch of juvenile radio jocks. It's funny because you make butthurt youtube videos and cry because no one takes you seriously.
And it's always funny just because you're lame. There will be a tl;dr, smarter than thou rant replying to this. That will be funny to read, too.
NeutroniumIon 3 years ago
Wow you 9/11 conspiratards argue like creationists. You heavily imply one thing, and then get all defensive when people see through your ruse. Then you just bring up irrelevant nonissues to back up your "point", you use ad hominems, argument from silence, and claim you're leaving the discussion when you're getting trounced, all because you can't accept the fact that MAYBE just MAYBE the big scary government you hate so much wasn't involved in some hollywood-type conspiracy.
Get a life, really.
NeutroniumIon 3 years ago
is that fat bastard?
DICKcheneyMASTER 3 years ago
No reason to suspect a conspiracy?? Why haven't we had a real criminal investigation?? If the 9/11 commission was not created to assign blame as they have officially stated and clearly failed to do, then who is responsible for finding the real perpetrators?? To claim there is no evidence of a cover up or gov. involvement is embarrassing. Demand a criminal investigation, if not for your OWN SAFETY, do it for HUMAN JUSTICE!!
kc0696 3 years ago
looks, it's obvious that you spend alot of time arguing with people about this on the net.. so much, that you dedicate your entire bio on your profile to bragging about your deeds.
it is clear that we won't get anywhere with this conversation.. (it's hard to when your opponent uses innuendo and strawmen as his main tactic)
I wish you the best.. good luck peddling your pharmaceuticals.
protofear 3 years ago 2
with that said, I never said they believed in a conspiracy.. NEVER.. when you insist that is what I mean.. it is your attempt to set up a strawman. I said they felt they were lied to, which is what they said.
now, it very well may be that their statements lead people to consider conspiracy theories, but that is the fault of the commission for not being through.. it isn't the American publics fault that they didn't "tied up all the loose ends"
protofear 3 years ago
another strawman:
"You've just accused the FAA and NORAD of complicity in a coverup"
I did no such thing.. I said "_If they (the commission) were being lied to_, then the commissions findings are false."
maybe you should look up the meaning of the word IF.
If they were being lied to, then their findings are false. i have said this the whole time. you insist of various tactics to try and prove me wrong mainly strawmen. but you cant deny the fact that the commissioners felt they were lied to.
protofear 3 years ago
And yet the FAA and NORAD response times only constituted a portion of the report and not the entire thing.
Nor does it any way affect the NIST report or the Purdue study, nor does it change the public record of what occurred that day.
So the 911 commision FELT like it was misled by pentagon officials trying to cya.
And... your point is again what?
torrent29 3 years ago
Actually whats a strawman arguement is you using these people who have nothing to do with the twoof movement nor do they have any reason to suspect a conspiracy as your back up.
let me take the time to point out that you've already backed out of defending several of your points, essentially conceding them, but for some reason you just refuse to realize that this article doesnt really support you. You've just accused the FAA and NORAD of complicity in a coverup... with no evidence!
torrent29 3 years ago
And yet they relied on false data to come to their conclusion. The dictabelt tape that determined that there were more gunshots fired was found to not be anywhere near dealey plaza essentially proving all of those conspiracy theorists wrong.
In the end JFK was more then likely shot by Oswald.
However for someone jaqing off like you claim to be, you have already come to your forgone conclusions and sold yourself out as ... indeed... a twoofer.
torrent29 3 years ago