Question Diversity

Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance, weighs the merits of racial diversity.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Diversity
• Race
• Race relations
• Racial conflict

[MrTheEldersOfZion]

Who is behind this racial conflict? The Jews! They get all the other races at each others throats and they come out on top. All races unite against the Jews!

[oregonflatland]

@lakewood425

you have a good point there. the italian restaurants were amazing in south korea - and there weren't any italians working there.

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza Diversity is forced. Given the choice, most whites want to preserve their race and culture; they prefer racially/ethnically homogeneous societies. You say people naturally like diversity yet White people have been (white flight) leaving the cities in massive numbers and other places with nonWhites for over 50 yrs now. Only 1% of the white race naturally likes diversity, the rest have been brainwashed, and sold an image. Segregation is inevitable, look at Brazil.

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza People are being told what to be attrakted to, there are hardly any whites on television anymore, it's all latinas and mulattoes, the media is making young white people think mixed children are better than blonde hair blue eyes. Young girls see blacks all over TV and are being coined into the IR game. Kick all nonWhites out of America and off the media, only show whites and lets just see if they were naturally attracted or if it was POP culture. They've simply been brainwashed.

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza What you propose is 'tolerance' which is not natural, tolerance is simply hiding your true feelings to make others feel welcomed. You are tolerating a race or culture you cannot stand.

When governments campaign in movements to encorage the gender of one race to prefer the gender of another race it is tampering, if there were laws against this kind of social engieneering 99% of race-mixing would end on its own.

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza Just because conflict in a racially homogenous society would be inevitable, it is not an argument against the claim that a racially homogenous society would have *less* conflict than a racially heterogenous society would, all other factors considered. We would have LESS problems in a Homogenous nation. LESS hate crimes and interracial rapes. Altruism is higher in ethnically homogenous societies and there is reduced tension and conflict.

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza Nations primarily white nations have opened their borders because the government wants to a) cheap work force and drug trade, the US government sneaks people in not only cheap workders but criminals. I have a cousin who workd border patrol in Texas. b) create a blended humanity where the white race disappears and everyone becomes one ugly disgusting brown race.

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza We can trade with other nations just fine while the other people stay in their own lands. We do not need immigration, multicultralism, miscegenation, and over all diversity. Chinese need to stay in China, and we will still do buisness with them, but I am affraid living in our lands, breeding with our people, and harming or replacing our race and culture is out of the question. Period.

To say in order to get chinese food we must import thousands of chinese people is absurd!

[lakewood425]

@RoyalFlushPlaza Sorry pal, computers and cars were first invented by Whites, thus they belong to us. All Asians do is manufacture cars and computers but they did not invent them, Europeans did. There is a big difference between inventing something and manufacturing something.

Whites hold all of the cards, we give the orders. They are our inventions and people should be kissing our butt and taking orders for the privledge of using them.

[RoyalFlushPlaza]

@lakewood425 Our ability to reason and our ability to relate to others (empathy and sympathy) is what ultimately drives us. We create laws because of these instinctive traits... Now laws are "unnatural" in the sense that human beings are naturally anarchists. If something is "unnatural" that doesn't make it inherently bad or good. Disease, however, is natural, so is it going against nature if we try to find cures to treat such afflictions? Technically, only the strongest should survive, right?

[RoyalFlushPlaza]

@lakewood425 Last but not least, conflicts arise when we are confronted with something new for the first time. This is obvious. But conflicts DO NOT stay at that same magnitude... they eventually break down and we are able to get along rather peacefully. Ensuring and FORCING strict racial segregation would undoubtfully cause more tension than a free country where people have the freedom to associate with whom they wish to associate to. And does racial homogenity = peace? Look at Africa.

[RoyalFlushPlaza]

@lakewood425 I'm all for white nationalism. I believe that if people of the white race want to congregate and associate with other white folks, then that's perfectly fine with me... I don't see how forced diversity works... but at the same time, people who actually like diversity SHOULD be able to practice it. But what I DON'T agree with is birthright. Why should something so arbitrary be the pinnacle of your existence? It is the essence of human beings to be inquisitive, NOT segregated.