Indo-European mummies in central Asia and China

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
47,643
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 28, 2008

Indo-European mummies in central Asia and China -

A branch of nomadic Indo-European people of the indo-germanic sub-group, related with Indo-European people (Germans, Celts, Iranians (Aryans), Greecs...) of Europe and Central Asia, called by Greecs as Tocharatoi, by Chinese and later Turko-Mongolian people as (Ta-)Yu-echi/Da-Xia/Da-Hia and Da-Shi (''Tajik'') were nomading in the pontic and central Asian´s stepes up to China and Mongolia. Earliest records of their existence goes back for 4000 years ago. Unlike most Indo-European languages, their language was an isolated one, tough it belonged to the centum-branch (centum: 100; German, English, Dutch...) of the Indo-European languages, unlike the satem-branch (satem:100; Iranic languages (Abestan/Avestan), Sanscrit, Vedic, Sarkholi, Hindustani/Urdu....). The first evidance of their language dates on the 8th century A.D when first religious books were written in the Tocharian language in all Central Asia, their native and original language beside Bactrian and Soghdian. However, they became famous under the name ''Kushan'' (from Guishang, modern chinese provnce Gansu) and later again they were part of the larger Central Asian´s tribalic confoderation of the Hephthalites, a mixed ethos (Sogdians, Bactrians, Tocharians, Persians, Turks, Mongols and possibly Tibetans and Koreans) formed of deadly warriors from large parts of Asia.

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Leader2OO7)

  • For those who believe slaves where non-Turks and mamlukes were Ossetians and other Caucasians: A Mamluk (Turkish: Memlük, also called Kölemen; Arabic: مملوك (singular), مماليك mamālīk (plural), "owned"; also transliterated mamlouk, mamluq, mamluke, mameluk, mameluke, mamaluke or marmeluke) was a soldier of slave origin, often of Turkic ancestry[1].

see all

All Comments (248)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Leader2OO7 R1a is a common Y-dna in Central Asia, wake up!

  • @Scythianist scythians were indeed indo european but hun whose leader was attila was anscester of mongol n turk

  • its really amazing to see the ancestors i really like to know about there life story and how they must have survived in Asian lands..!!

  • @Gjalpinulva

    Mamluks were Turkic slaves, serving for Persians and their vezirs. Later, they were given to the Abbasids as gifts. In slavrey, they were thought how to read, write, management, poetry, military etc. Not to use the Iranic people or Persians, the Iranians used many often these Turkic slaves as soldiers, same as Abbasids. The Ghaznavids were of Mamluke origine and former slaves of Persian Samanids, Tahirids, Saffarids, Farighunids, Sassanids etc.

  • @VendPrekmurec

    Thank you brother, I will.

  • @OrthodoxDarwinist

    no of course not. They say they resemble modern-day Tajiks and Iranians and some even nordic people.. such as Germans and Scandinavians.

  • @DJKAYZEE

    Turan does not mean ''Turk''. It was used in the Avesta and Ferdowsi to designate ''Aryans'' who did not belong to a settled community and had not zoroastrianism as religion. Nomads and the settlements had already struggles with eachother. That is the strongest message of Avesta. The nomads, the wild barbarians, soldiers and servants of Ahriman (devil and opponent of Ahura->God of light) vs ''Aryans'' (Settlements and Zoroastrians. 'Iran and AnIran' -> Aryan (nobility) and un-Aryan

  • @IdelUralState

    Turks are Mongolids. They are no ''blue eyed'' or ''blond''. If there are blue eyed Turks than because someone in the ancestory was not a Turk but a foreigner. That was in the case of Djingis Khan, a Mongol, who was descriped by his Persian court writer as red haired and green-eyed which indicates that one of his ancestors may belonged to a non-Mongol tribe, possibly Scythian/Sacae or even Tocharian.

  • Asianhordes, you need education... to understand what Indo-European and European means.... sigh*

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more