Reorganized, new scenes added, including some amateur. Please see
watch?v=1G6TQfIHJPo
for the amateur and a pointer to the source.
2JOHNNYT suggested this sidebar needed work. I thank him and here is my adjustment.
The CBS "chopper" revolved around WTC1 on the west side from slghtly south of WTC1 to slightly north.
An amazing thing happened as the chopper reached the point where the north face of WTC1 was perpendicular to the view captured on the camera...
COS(90)=0
Design programs that take an idea that you have made flat, then rotate it for other possible views involve math on/in a sphere.
Spherical math/rotating involves using trig functions in various mathematical relationships, including division.
Unfortunately, all trig functions have an angle for which the value of the function is zero. Dividing by zero is described as undefined.
But, in fact, few functions are truly undefined when the denominator is zero; that's when we use the "limit" idea. You know, the limit of such and such as the denominator approaches a neighborhood of zero.
Well, since we are dealing with an image, we know that the image is not undefined when the angle requires division by a trig function of value zero. But, a lot of programmers don't have the patience and/or knowledge to know what the real condition is at "divide by zero," so they just plug in something that works to keep the program from crashing.
In this case it resulted in the "billowing smoke" we saw facing us (180 or zero degrees) getting less billowing as we rotated around the image of the towers, finally becoming as flat as the side of the tower when 90 degrees was hit and COS(90) equaled 0. The program didnt crash, just the official lie.
The "real" smoke on the south side of wtc1 always shoots out from the wall, no matter what angle we view it from.
The fake smoke subject to trig functions on the north side forgets to billow when we see it from 90 degrees!
How is this a smoking gun?
The billowing smoke coming from the north face stopped billowing.
Fortunately, as the "chopper" did not stay long at the perpendicular position and the COS of the angle of the view stopped being zero, the north face smoke grew ever more billowy as required in the RFP.
So, I have some advice for the budding graphic/digital artists out there...
Don't quit math!
murtagh, lin and cellini may be verified at
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html
Thanks to TheWebFairy for backing up the amateur video the stills were taken from.
@CNN911Fakes You're honestly going to tell me that even though millions upon millions of people watched sept 11 unfold both on tv and in person, that it was fake? I don't think you could "imagine" two commercial airliners flying right above your head and into two of what were some of the tallest buildings in the world?
NataliaMurad1 1 month ago
@NataliaMurad1 Nope. I am telling you that the smoke coming out of the north side of wtc1 shown in this video is fake. I am telling you that what this video shows, seen on TV, was not seen by any one on the ground.
Simple trig.
CNN911Fakes 1 month ago
@CNN911Fakes -- That's absolutely stupid and recklessly irresponsible, regardless if you think they were terrorist acts or a false-flag. The towers destruction were fact. This sounds like nonsense No Plane idiocy to discredit the Truth Movement. FAIL
starmanskye 2 weeks ago
@starmanskye Gosh, you want to discuss "no plane" on this video that proves fake smoke. Why?
CNN911Fakes 2 weeks ago
Oh my god would you stop with the bs 9/11 conspiracy crap? You're not proving any point and you aren't doing anyone any favors with these videos.
NataliaMurad1 1 month ago
@NataliaMurad1 Don't understand trig, huh?
CNN911Fakes 1 month ago