Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Richard Dawkins:Lecture1. Waking up in the universe (5 of 7)

Richard Dawkins  
 
Customize

More From: DrMontague

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

136 ratings
Sign in to rate
17,641 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (61)   Options

Loading...
wthbrosiff59 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
who the fuck has proof that bacteria goes back 3.5 thousand million years.....
DrMontague (3 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Geologists.! You dozy fuckwited creationist.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
Kimbahley (8 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
"Here we have the zebra and the rhino... not to scale"

lol. The toy zebra is about 3 times the size of the rhino and smaller than the lion. The insects are the size of the mammals, and some of the animals are the same size of the branches that represent the millions of years they have evolved. I love that he finds it necessary to point out that it's not to scale.
DaveAllenDaveAllen (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I think he means the actual tree is not to scale, not the models at the ends of the branches.
MovieClipUploads (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
He meant the branches, which signifiy how close they're related to each other.
forza599 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
A hell of a lot more of them would be starving now without. And PLEASE, I've spent plenty of time in the 3rd world and have seen more poverty in a week than most Americans will ever see in their lives so don't talk down to me as if you have some special knowledge of the world's suffering. If you want to see starvation visit the USSR at the height of its wonderful socialist system.

PS my views on economics are based on BOOKS written by many different ECONOMISTS over many different time periods.
DrMontague (9 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
1.Then you really are sucked in by the propaganda. If the former USSR were truely communist then there would have been no poverty and every one would have lived high quality life styles. The USSR was a totalitarian regime not a communist way of life. However we need to ask why revolutions occur, we need to understand the the events that lead up to revolution. Revolution occur when millions of people beome dissaffeted. as with the French revolutions.
DrMontague (9 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
2 in the 1930s we had the great depression millions throughout Europe and America were living in the most disgraceful poverty. This eventually lead to war with the rise of Hitler. The end of the war saw the development of the eastern block countries where an attempt to start a new social order against the exploitation of the capitalist system. Even present day capitalism is now failing i.e. the credit crunch. people are having their houses repossessed etc. Should they all live on the street?
DrMontague (9 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
If capitalism was such a brilliant system then we would not have had the WWII. Capitalism had made millions of peoples lives misery. What do you think these people should have done? Starve! Should people have just watched their children starve and hope that thing would get better. There was no shortage of food or materials back in the 30s but millions suffered. The same applies now. We will see more unrest and a rise a crime as the credit crunch bites even deeper, youmight become a victim of it

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.