Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

2008 BMW M5 Track Video

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
170,656
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 8, 2008

SEE IF THE M5 BEATS THE CADILLAC CTS-V:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=136636

Once you get your hands on a supercharged 556-horsepower 2009 Cadillac CTS-V, you know that you need a 500-hp 2008 BMW M5 with which to measure it. It's a matter of practical science.

Of course, there's a sizable price difference between the $59,995 CTS-V and the $86,675 M5, and we don't want to get our comparison results skewed by mere money. Maybe we should add the 507-hp 2009 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG to our science project. Trouble is, this Merc's $86,875 price tag still doesn't put the CTS-V under any pressure.

We had a better idea. We opted for the more nimble 2009 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG. This compact sedan cranks out only 451 hp, but it weighs almost 400 pounds less than the E63, and its base price of $58,075 rings up about $2,000 cheaper than the CTS-V.

Is the 2009 Cadillac CTS-V a true benchmark in the super sedan category? Measured against the pure performance of the 2008 BMW M5 and the value of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG, we knew the truth would come out.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • thumbs up if you think they had it in 400hp mode for the tests! these numbers are incorrect for this car!! PUSH THE M BUTTON AND DO IT AGAIN! :)

  • the m5 is the best saloon car in the world end of.

see all

All Comments (363)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this was my dream car when it first came out.

  • Not sure of the other results but they are definitely off by at least 0.3 of a second on the 0-60 and quarter mile runs, thats for sure.

    Then again the M5 does need a little technique and getting use to for people driving it a first time. I place the blame on human error strictly.

  • what a noise...RIP V10 =(

  • @0m1nous i doubt it would have gotten 4.8 0-60 in p400 mode ??

    i think i struggle to get under 5 sec in p500S

  • Jus remember to get a certified pre-owned one so when the electronic diff goes(and it will) you'll be covered :)

  • see racing my 2009 M5 E60:

    /watch?v=MkpyY37pMXA

  • @dickoos The hell it is man no urgument bout that and thank you for aknowledging that man. it a V10 masterpiece

  • @Astonmartinv12 your comment sould be in the highest rated comments

  • They didnt test 0-60 with 1 foot roll out. 4.5 sec is the ACTUAL 0-60 mph time for the M5.

    The car was in M mode.

  • @SupraTompan Its called launch control.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more