Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Hilary Putnam on the Philosophy of Science: Section 4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
24,454
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 15, 2008

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I wish Putnam had talked more on functionalism of the mind.

  • I disagree. Putnam never dismisses the insight and work that is produced in biology, he only talks about the methodologies in biology and how they, at the time, do not pose the same conceptual importance/difficulty as the methodologies that physicists had been doing. Biology still falls under the methodologies that were popularized by physicists, so the focus on physics is easy to understand. The central topic in this programme [in 1987] is the methodologies, not the specific theories.

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It truly amazes me the number of people who still refuse to agree with the theory of evolution in the United States. It's very embarrassing.

  • Putnam taught Marxism for a short period of time, I'd be interested in hearing more about this.

  • lol

  • @bucles2000 I'd be interested to read it. I'm even more interested in how you think quantum mechanics and general relativity displays a lack of imagination, while simultaniously asserting that you've come up with a unified field theory using just classical mechanics.

  • @mightyafrowhitey I have a manuscript to prove it. Just 54 pages.

  • @tristramshandy3 very well said!!!

  • @bucles2000 a complete lack of imagination?!?!? was that meant to be a joke? if so, the punchline completely eludes me...

  • @PKDana I don't think it's imperceivable. but there is no way to objectively perceive is as it really is. because to do so, we would have to stand outside of the universe. if the universe is defined as everything there is in the physsical world, any observer will himself be a part of the universe he is perceiving, and even with our very best instruments we will still be able to pierce only so deep into the fabric of existence.

  • @nazra7 I'm a little unclear as to what you mean by the soul.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more