Water Vapor clip From "Global Warming or Global Governance"

This is a clip from Dr. Michael Coffman's "Global Warming or Global Governance". It is important to note the following:
1. Water vapor accounts for 97% of GHG (greenhouse gas)
2. Carbon dioxide only accounts for 2% of GHGs.
3. Human caused carbon dioxide emissions are less than 1%

• Category

  News & Politics

[tubeshok]

The objective of controlling greenhouse gases is to implement political policies, like the EPA’s 18,000 page document with carbon reduction codes that also include a Cap-and-Trade scheme.

[Deathswalk]

1 person thinks this video is a lie

[grindupBaker]

LOL. @1:15-2:18 he demonstrates one of the +ve feedback concerns of scientists, that the added water vapour will keep the planet warmer still. He's supposed to show clouds only bouncing sunlight back to space. I thought the uploader comments were indicating he was with the coal lobby group but he'as actually an alarmist.

[Benn1290]

I work in GHG verification and believe me all it is ,is its a business with 99% bullshit. I agree we should be nicer with nature and recycle everything, but all the rest is bull and dollars.

[viewer517]

it is just so amusing to see a presentation showing such a basic lack of understanding of climate science! if anyone watching wants the science of climate change explained, and the garbage of the denialist community disproven fact by fact, then i suggest visiting Potholer54's channel.

[wrjamescom]

Once you account for greenhouse charactics as wel as volume, the CO2 added by mad to the atmosphere, EVEN IF you believe the inflated data from Al Gore's magic CO2 religion, amounts to only 0.12%of the earth's total greenhouse gasses. And if you then factor in the water's regulation of earth's reflectivity, the water's transportation of energy from the surface, etc. the effect of ALL of the CO2, including the natural volume, becomes totally meaningless.

[wavelength121]

Scare? Climate Change was a proven phenomenon long before Al Gore or Obama were even born. I did my own research back in grade school. Where do you get your data? No, the internet is not a source. Neither is Fox News or whatever other right-wing talking-head lobbyist riled you up like a good little sheep. Go back to what you're good at, Eating and Spending, like a good little capitalist. Let the real men fix the country and save the environment. We've been doing fine without you.

[wavelength121]

::tosses keys::

Park it. And here's a buck for a Snickers.

[dagrimreeefah]

Using junk terms like "radiative forcing" (a term coined by the IPCC, a UN panel of socialists, not scientists, with a political agenda to impose a global tax) doesn't prove anything, except how fucking clueless you are, how much of a band wagon-riding tool you are, and how you need to put the wikipedia down and actually open a real, independent, climate science book. BTW, approx. 2,000 of the ~2,200 climate scientists who worked for the IPCC denounce AGW, you pathetic sheep.

[dagrimreeefah]

It's also interesting to note that more than a million years ago, global CO2 levels were 12 times higher than they are today, and it was COOLER. It's just pathetic that you think informative videos like this that are trying to STAVE OFF GLOBAL TAXES is propaganda, but the same garbage science that has been hand fed to you by celebrities and unelected officials to PUSH A GLOBAL TAX is not propaganda. You, sir, are a fucking witless pawn.

[dagrimreeefah]

What is utter garbage is the fact that you call this "right wing propaganda". Hahaha you're so fucking stupid it hurts. What do you think AGW is? Propaganda folks. Remember the "global cooling" scare in the 70's? Remember the ozone layer scare in the 90's? Besides that, have you forgot about those massive oceans out there, the same oceans that intake MASSIVE amounts of CO2 everyday? Hahaha fucking stupid ass kids these days, never doing their own research and just blindly following

[dagrimreeefah]

"these people think they can just make up their own facts to scare people into following the status quo"

What do you think the whole "climate change" (formerly "global warming") scare is? Man, you're a fucking idiot if you couldn't see the irony in your asinine statement. Go back to never doing your own research and listening to what your unelected leaders (Obama, Al Gore) say with no critical thinking, just so you can take the lazy path to fitting in with the "status quo".