Niels Harrit - The London Interview (part 3)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
889 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 14, 2009

Niels Harrit concludes the London Interview by talking about the Exposives of the Future, Building 7, The Media and Alternative Theories - please be sure to see parts 1 and 2 first to understand the flow of the conversation...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ACriticalState)

  • Do you really think any government would kill 3000 of its citizens just to enter a war with Iraq? Surely there are less risky ways!

  • Firstly, no-one suggested it was the government - that is casting the net too wide.

    Secondly, the war which was initiated as a result of this "new pearl harbour" to quote the project for a new american century (google it) was the rather catch-all "War on Terror" - so who is the enemy then? How will we know when the war is won?

    Please understand, no-one who knows is willing to publicly go on the record - what we have are legitimate doubts about the official version which must be investigated

see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I have had a bumper sticker on my car on 9/11truth. Used to be, I'd receive "stares" from people who made a point of shaking their head, like I'm crazy. But, over the last couple years, I have noticed a change. Not so confrontational, anymore.

  • Right on...it's got false flag written all over it.

  • 911 a false flag attack. period!

  • Thank you for this very valuable posting. This is one of the most important issues of our time. Please keep the information coming and let's not tolerate attempts to suppress the dissemination of the truth!

  • Yes I have seen the collapse of WTC1 + 2 and 7. All perfectly normal. You wanna see something that is not there then thats up to you. Do NOT try to say I do not know what I am talking about.

    Niels Harrit said that the pieces they found were mm not nanometer so please stop the lies.

    it IS possible for a building to fall the way they did. Get over yourself and get into reality.

    It is much more intersting to think otherwise though so I can understand your input. Thanks all the same.

  • 9/11 was a masterful work of intelligence. You obviously haven't done enough research to understand all that's going on...

    Milimeter? Try nanometer pieces of thermitic materials mixed in perfect stochiometric quantities. LOL, it's amazing how people try to rationalize and distort these things to where they fit their preconceived notion...

    Why not try to gather more information and then formulate your opinion? That would be the intelligent and scientific way to approach the problem.

  • Please be aware the shills have been set a task on this one...

    Matty690 are you familiar with the term 'false flag'.

    False flag events have in the past cost many lives.

    Not just in the event but in the aftermath...

    You seem capable of debate and you appear to have a brain capable of critical thinking yet you contradict the facts... strange to me...

    You say theres no mountain of evidence because the material is small?

    Thats a joke and you must realise it...

    DNA ?

    Why bother...

    Proof is Proof!

  • 1. No I have not the time or the inclination to spend hours and hours on this subject at the moment. Plus it is difficult to see true information now the conspirasy theorists have kicked in.

    2. You think there are no Al-Qaida in Afgan? Iran next? How many will they kill for that?

    3. All depends on which media you look at. I bet I could find a poll that said he was no where near 90%+!!

    3000+ dead to convince the populous that a war is just? Far too risky to me.

  • You obviously haven't researched the subject in depth. Please... go research rather than commenting on Youtube.

    As for your statements on risk, most Americans still believe that Al-Qaida is responsible and we are justified attacking Afghanistan (most of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia).

    Even though it was a sloppy execution they had the brainwashing power of the media and the tribal group-think that caused Bush's ratings to go to all time highs of 90+%

  • MOUNTAIN?? Where?? Millimeter size pieces of material which have similar properties to futuristic explosives? Besides that there is very little credible evidence to suggest such a thing. I wouldnt even call that pile let alone a mountain!

    If you were "they" and you wanted a legitimate reason to attack another country this would be well, well ,well off the chart! Like I say - there are less risky ways. You dont put yourself in the line of fire when you dont even need to be against the wall!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more