Re: Why I Chose Atheism

Video Responses Are Automatically Approved

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Christianity
• Christians
• Atheist
• Atheism
• TheAmazingAtheist
• Belief
• Reality
• Choice
• Choose

[AmazingAtheistAvatar]

1st comment

[seli88]

Lame.

[fnog9]

WOW!!!! Whoever made this shit is a thousand times as lame as Theamazingatheist. What a fucking low life LOSER you would have to be.

[Dallows65]

Expect a massive rebutal to your claims, for they are based on short sightedness, and do not consider the long term affects of the complete rejection of religion.

The argument of Science > Relgion has a serious flaw, and you must be the blind not to see it. The greatest example is to look at the lives of Animals in the wild, and compare them to Human Society. Also consider this: why do we call the "wild" what we call it? What is "nature"?And best of all, lookover your own argument, it is weak

[joshmonster94]

@MrDathon1577

actually, there are many planets the "perfect" distance from their sons all over the universe, a few are going through a change similar to earth's 1st atmospheric state, which then can result in, after a few more atmospheric changes, our current state. of course they also might not, by the time it's atmosphere changes in any noticeable way, our family lines will be long gone.

[joshmonster94]

@Misanthrophy101

a lot older than 6 million, closer to 6 billion.

[MrDathon1577]

@Misanthrophy101 from the sun and a perfect distance away from the moon and is tilted at the perfect axis and truns at the perfect speed compared to ALL the planets we can see and study and out of the vast universe Earth is the ONLY planet that sustains life, sorry but your pathetic macro evolution theory and big bang theory are so sadly and idiotically stupid with its ideals its laughable. you choose not to believe for one reason and that is then you would have to admit you are not in control.

[MrDathon1577]

@Misanthrophy101 have always been here we have just leanred more about how to use them same as the tv. the wind is one where we now can calculate its velocity and severity due to doplar and can some what predict and see the path of it. we are not God because we have learned more about it we are merely expanding our understanding. i know God exists and why i see it all around me daily, there has been nothing made by man that can compete. the very fact that Earth is set up perfect distance ...

[MrDathon1577]

@Misanthrophy101 dear young naive boy, if you lived 100 years ago and i told you that we would fly to the moon you would say i was mad, or if i asked you explain that wind exists you would say well we can see its actions. or if you lived in Biblical times and i told you the world revolved around the sun you would say i am mad, these are all things that are capable and viable you just do not have the knowledge and know how to do it, for example the materials used to make the space ship ...

[Misanthrophy101]

@Misanthrophy101 ...ironically renders your all-knowing God less infallable. So the only other excuse for you to beleive otherwise is that you are either unbelievably stupid, or just simply willfully ignorant. Personally I'm proned to believe science supported by plausibe, solid, and concrete evidence over hackeyed archaic tomes of contradictions, fallacies, and farytales written by your supposed God.

[Misanthrophy101]

@Misanthrophy101 Although, if you were to ask if the the Christian God doen't exist then, we say so by virtue of the properties contrary to biblical text known to us that your God in fact does not. The bible says that the earth is 6000 years old when we know it's 6 million, it also says the earth is flat when we know it's round, and that earthquakes are caused by shifting techtonic plates, and not because God shuffled his feet. Also his knowllege was limited to the people of his day which ...

[Misanthrophy101]

@Misanthrophy101 Furthermore telling people to prove God doesn't exist is like asking someone to prove that I don't have an invisible veloceraper in my closet. In general you cannot because it is an unfalsifiable hypothesis because their properties are not known to us. However if I asked you to prove that I don't have a blue invisible veloceraptor in my closet, by virtue it this statement would be false because you can clearly see it's not bue because those are properties that are known to us.