I made 3 errors which I will clear up here.
1.) 13 steps on the pyramid on the dollar bill.
I argued that it represents the 13 families based on Springmeiers work and how because he was framed ...
I made 3 errors which I will clear up here.
1.) 13 steps on the pyramid on the dollar bill.
I argued that it represents the 13 families based on Springmeiers work and how because he was framed and jailed that gives merit to that argumentation. Rich responded and stated that it was probably due to the 13 colonies. My rebuttal to that was inadequate so here I seek to bring the point home stronger. There are several things to take into consideration on this point. One: The seal was placed on the bill in 1934 under Franklin D. Roosevelt a 32 degree Freemason of the Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine which I documented as partaking in satanic rituals. Rich argued that the reason Springmeiers thesis was false was because some of the families were not around when the seal was placed on the bill. However I did some checking and indeed all of the families pre-date 1934. The original founder of the Astor fortune was John Jacob Astor (1763-1884). Eugene H. Bundy, lawyer, judge (1889-1896), John Churton Collins, In 1886 he wrote a book on Voltaire, Samuel Du Pont to Anne Alexandrine Montechanin in 1737 in Paris, France, Sambrooke Freeman (1721-82). He was from Fawley Court, near Henley, in Berkshire. He went to Oxford, Bernet Shafer Kennedy (1798-1878) married Phebe Freeman in 1820, Li Yuan was the founder of the Tang Dynasty 906 A.D., Socrates Onassis 1922 goes back to Mehmet Talaat Pasha (1872-1921), Alfred Krupp (1838), William Avery Rockefeller (1810 -1906), Amsel Rothschild placed his sons in the major European capitals (1778/1818), Benjamin Russell (1761-1845)- Mason, William Van Duyn (1695-1773). There are the 13 families. All of them pre-date 1934. To further prove my point if you examine the whole seal, the eagle has 32 feathers on the right wing and 33 feathers on the left signifying the last two degrees of the Scottish rite. The tail has 9 feathers which signify the 9th degree of the York rite. The eagle itself is a prominent icon of the Scottish rite extensively used as symbols outside of their lodges. F.D.R was a 32 degree, the connection is definitely there. Springmeier was framed and jailed for releasing the information regarding the number 13 on the bill. The response Rich offered is subliminal indirect reverse psychological propaganda similar to Bush's state of the union speech in 2001. Study that.
2.) The 1776 issue. This is a simple error. I thought the bill said May 1, 1776 in Roman numerals and forgot to mention May 1st in the debate, so it seemed like I was arguing based only on the year and not the specific date. That is why I said the country wasn't founded then. I had listened to John Todd, a guy who was murdered by the Illuminati, who was talking about May 1, 1776 as significant, and didn't form my argument properly when rushing on that paper. That point seems to be irrelevant looking back. There is a possibility of it being related to the founding of the Illuminati because the seal was placed onto the bill in 1934 when Freemasonry was already long corrupt. It is not like the seal rivals the founding of the Illuminati in chronological history.
3.) The Catholic Church on Freemasonry. Although I cleared this up in a video I feel that I should put a stamp on that once and for all. Here is how I should have stated the argument: In Canon Law 2335 the church is very strict against Freemasonry. There they prohibited anyone from joining any lodge ever. If the church felt the same in 1983 they wouldn't have even made canon 1374 which says you might not receive communion if you are caught within an organization that plots against the church. It says nothing of freemasonry or excommunication contrary to Canon 2335. Why even introduce the new law if your stance is still the same and if 1374 only addresses the issue of joining these types of organizations? There is no other reason than the Church easing up on Freemasonry which I noted in my film, 'Exposing the Satanic Empire.' In the debate however I was talking off the top of my head and had previously mixed up the dates and documents based on shody source material that was emailed to me from a person who I recently seperated myself from. That wasn't in my debate paper. That was in response to an argument about the Knights Templar who were exonerated by the church which I concede to, although that cult is far from innocent.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
lifetime. There is only proof of the french revolution. Weishaupt wasnt rich. How did he go all over the world recruiting people? Recruiting really really rich people at that. Telemarketing? Have you seen the brotherhood of the bell? I think that movie explains more or less how it works. Freemasonry are the 40000 members of the bell. The people at the top are in on the agenda but its not a free-masonic conspiracy. Its a way to meet in private. Like the many round table groups are
You are making big claims without any evidence. At this time I have over 300 sources states part of what you are saying is true but much of it is rhetoric.
the jesuits were officialy outlawed. His job was held by Jesuits before they were disbanded. Weishaupt was a proffesor of cannon law.. at a very young age I might add. He got his docterate at 20. When he went into hiding it seems to be because of the former Jesuits who were still powerful. The Order of the perfect billists is a reaction to them. The Jesuits controlled learning for a few hundred years. The HRE. the french, and english empiress lost most of thier power during weishaupts...
Well if you say the illuminati invaded free-masonry. Ive seen the letters to washington Im aware of what they call the illuminati, but during that time it was called the order of the perfect billists. Which was the original name. Weishaupt was called Brother Spartacus in this group. Weishaupt never said he would take power he meant for Humanity would arise together in unity. This is what he said not that i neccesarily believe him. He was persecuted by the Jesuits cause he kept his job after
From reading the Encyclopedia of Freemason and using the Historical Method, the evidence tells me that the Illuminati operates under other names and occupations. Sorry but I have over 500 sources which why I am not satisfied of your thesis.
You see the European Union is the Holy Roman Empire. I dont mean because the catholic head is at the church. But the monarchys of europe are descended from those same Dukes and Lords from the HRE since1000 years ago. They are all German blood.
The only thing i am skeptic about is the Weishaupt connection cause he died in hiding with royalty mind you. Im jus theorizing but he seemsto be a fall guy for somethin else.
It might be a coincidence these things happened in his lifetime too.
You are right. I mispoke. WHat i said was Im not sure if he had anythin to do with them. What i should have followed that with is.. If we would have had something to do with it. Those some people are the ones vying for power now under the guise of the alledged Illuminati. Saxor Coburg-Attinburg is the lineage of the so called Windsor family. The Roman Empereor dissapeared in 1806 because of Napoleon. You know when people with that amount of power just dissapear in History somethings up.
This is a substantial claim which the evidence does not back up. The documentation available shows that they infiltrated Freemasonry. Canon Law 1374 and 2335 attest that Catholicism is accepting Freemasonry. Secondly, Weishaupt didn't dethrone anyone. I recommend you provide substantial evidence for this claim. I deal with hardcore facts which have to satisfy the rigures of the Historical Method.
Incidently. In his lifetime he saw the deaths of the french monarchs and the dissolving of the Holy lRoman Empire. which reigned for more then a millenia. Im not really sure if he had anythin to do with them, but i know that the people who he de-throned are in power now. If you are farmiliar with the bloodlines of the "illuminati". Do you notice his bloodline is not mentioned? The Illuminati are the scapegoats like the masons. Make everyone look left... and go right. thx for your response.
The problem with this assertion is that there is more to it than that. They wanted to establish themselves as the sole rulers. Weishaupt admitted this. What is more interesting is that G. Washington shows that the Illuminati entered into America and spread. He called it them diabolical. The primary sources show that they were vicious.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Have you seen the brotherhood of the bell? I think that movie explains more or less how it works. Freemasonry are the 40000 members of the bell. The people at the top are in on the agenda but its not a free-masonic conspiracy. Its a way to meet in private. Like the many round table groups are
You are making big claims without any evidence. At this time I have over 300 sources states part of what you are saying is true but much of it is rhetoric.
From reading the Encyclopedia of Freemason and using the Historical Method, the evidence tells me that the Illuminati operates under other names and occupations. Sorry but I have over 500 sources which why I am not satisfied of your thesis.
The only thing i am skeptic about is the Weishaupt connection cause he died in hiding with royalty mind you. Im jus theorizing but he seemsto be a fall guy for somethin else.
It might be a coincidence these things happened in his lifetime too.
This is a substantial claim which the evidence does not back up. The documentation available shows that they infiltrated Freemasonry. Canon Law 1374 and 2335 attest that Catholicism is accepting Freemasonry. Secondly, Weishaupt didn't dethrone anyone. I recommend you provide substantial evidence for this claim. I deal with hardcore facts which have to satisfy the rigures of the Historical Method.
The problem with this assertion is that there is more to it than that. They wanted to establish themselves as the sole rulers. Weishaupt admitted this. What is more interesting is that G. Washington shows that the Illuminati entered into America and spread. He called it them diabolical. The primary sources show that they were vicious.