If I recall correctly, there are a few scenes in the film, where you can only see the back of Hicks, in which its James Remar, not Michael Biehn acting.
@diuga1 Depends on who you ask. Some reports say he & Cameron just didn't see eye to eye about the Hicks character, others just say that Remar left for personal reasons unrelated to the film. Either way I have a hard time picturing mean, villian-faced Remar (instead of baby-face Biehn) in the sympathetic role of Hicks...
8:07 Damn, Ron Jeremy is in everything
rweghg3 4 days ago
If I recall correctly, there are a few scenes in the film, where you can only see the back of Hicks, in which its James Remar, not Michael Biehn acting.
BansheeBot1 6 days ago
Thants!
kharnifex 2 weeks ago
@gary1632 U$18 000 000 in 1986 is probably U$100 000 000 nowadays (due to infaltion)
diuga1 3 weeks ago
@HailAnts Thank you, Ants!
diuga1 3 weeks ago
@diuga1 Depends on who you ask. Some reports say he & Cameron just didn't see eye to eye about the Hicks character, others just say that Remar left for personal reasons unrelated to the film. Either way I have a hard time picturing mean, villian-faced Remar (instead of baby-face Biehn) in the sympathetic role of Hicks...
HailAnts 3 weeks ago
@mjollner23 1:43 "dick bush" lol this documentary is filled with sexual references!
thedevo01 3 weeks ago
@thedevo01 "The chemistry between Jim and dick didn't work..."
mjollner23 3 weeks ago
@HailAnts Thanks for the info...do you know why he was replaced?
diuga1 3 weeks ago
8:13 RON JEREMYS BROTHER LOL
TheGhostOfPainsey 3 weeks ago