YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Googol and Googolplex - Numberphile

numberphile numberphile·142 videos
451,978
992,909
Like     Dislike 314

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like numberphile's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike numberphile's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add numberphile's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 17, 2012

We're talking pretty big numbers here... And an interesting idea about what it'd be like traveling in a Googolplex-sized Universe!

With Antonio (Tony) Padilla and Ria Symonds from the University of Nottingham.

Website: http://www.numberphile.com/
Numberphile on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/numberphile
Numberphile tweets: https://twitter.com/numberphile

Videos by Brady Haran

About the brown paper: http://periodicvideos.blogspot.com/20...

Brady's other channels include:
http://www.youtube.com/periodicvideos (Chemistry stuff)
http://www.youtube.com/sixtysymbols (Physics and astronomy)
http://www.youtube.com/DeepSkyVideos (Space stuff)
http://www.youtube.com/nottinghamscience (Science and behind the scenes)
http://www.youtube.com/foodskey (Food science)
http://www.youtube.com/BackstageScience (Big science facilities)
http://www.youtube.com/favscientist (Favourite scientists)
http://www.youtube.com/bibledex (Academic look at the Bible)
http://www.youtube.com/wordsoftheworld (Modern language and culture)

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • bella belle

    How many atoms could you fit in the universe? Bigger than googol?

    · 14

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bella belle's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bella belle's comment.
  • MrTravisTank

    The planck distance is actually smaller than an atom.

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrTravisTank's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrTravisTank's comment.
    in reply to bella belle (Show the comment)

All Comments (10,469)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • StreetFighterCasuals

    Short Scale:

    1,000,000- million

    1,000,000,000 - Billion etc. It's just named out of convience

    Long Scale

    (1,000,000)^1 = million

    (1,000,000)^2=1,000,000,000,00­0=Billion (raised million to the power of 2 [bi])

    (1,000,000)^3=1,000,000,000,00­0,000,000= Trillion etc.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate StreetFighterCasuals's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate StreetFighterCasuals's comment.
    in reply to Rayan Al-Suwailmi (Show the comment)
  • Rayan Al-Suwailmi

    But it doesn't make any sense. A million is a thousand thousand. And a billion is a thousand million. A trillion is a thousand billion...etc. I'm not trying to make a fuss or anything. I'm just trying to understand the different scales. And by the way, I'm from Saudi Arabia :)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Rayan Al-Suwailmi's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Rayan Al-Suwailmi's comment.
    in reply to Pablo M.V.C. (Show the comment)
  • nekogod

    He can certainly conclude there would be 2 you's despite the rarity, in fact you could ask in our universe is any m^2 of space exactly identical to any other? Maybe, maybe not. A cubic meter of star A is not the same as a cubic meter of star B, he's talking EXACT copies down to the speed and position of each individual particle, I would wager every m^2 of our universe is unique and no more or less likely to be repeated than any other.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nekogod's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate nekogod's comment.
    in reply to Ziggletooth (Show the comment)
  • Ziggletooth

    you've missed the point entirely. lets take another example.

    a cubic feet of star is more common than a cubic feet of hippo in the universe, so the chances of exactly the same particle placement of a cubic feet of star is significantly more likely than coming across another exact copy of hippo particles.

    the composition of the universe is not random, humans are rarer than rock etc. he didn't account for the composition of the universe so he cannot conclude whether there could be two you's

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ziggletooth's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Ziggletooth's comment.
    in reply to nekogod (Show the comment)
  • lekremyelsew

    First find out how many Brady-volumes could fit in that universe, then divide that number by the amount of quantum states that can exist within 1 Brady-volume.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate lekremyelsew's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate lekremyelsew's comment.
    in reply to marko19914 (Show the comment)
  • huntinater6k

    Get NASA's new quantum super computer and copy and paste 0's, you'd probably reach googolplex fairly quickly

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate huntinater6k's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate huntinater6k's comment.
  • Paul Pittlerson

    I'm pretty sure they were talking about 'the observable universe', which is not infinite. No one knows for sure about the actual full universe yet, but our best guess so far is that it's infinite.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Paul Pittlerson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Paul Pittlerson's comment.
    in reply to Koltus (Show the comment)
  • Jonah Pearl

    So if you use Wikipedia, the universe's diameter is 93 billion light years, the Van der Waal radius of a carbon atom is 170 pm. If you convert units, cube both to find volume, and divide, you get 1.732839*10^103. Math.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonah Pearl's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonah Pearl's comment.
    in reply to bella belle (Show the comment)
  • Jonah Pearl

    Well if we say the universe is infinite, you can basically say anything you want about it and it must be true (i.e. somewhere there are monkeys floating in space writing out Shakespeare's plays in some language that has yet to be created on Earth). But that seems outlandish; I think this video assumes the universe is finite.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonah Pearl's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonah Pearl's comment.
    in reply to Koltus (Show the comment)
  • Jonah Pearl

    I was about to write the same thing but then I saw you had already written it. The probabilities of quantum states are probably not all equal, and you generally need energy input to create many of the molecules that make up life. Please correct me if I'm wrong, though.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonah Pearl's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Jonah Pearl's comment.
    in reply to Ziggletooth (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later