@wanwaimeng i have detailed in my intial posts ( a series of posts commentary to your video) in which i detail where you have made self-contradictions in your words.
i do however agree philosophically with the comments you make in the last few minutes of the video, i think from 18 mins in.
@nekoboy86 "and by being forceful and very rude and disrespectful about your theories, which you will also deny, where or what do you hope to get?" -- this is a question aimed at yourself, i wont deny that...
perhaps in your unawareness you have fallen into the darkness.
i made a some points based on the facts of the video. then i concluded with advice. that is 'polite'. again i also mentioned in my last posts this (read). i want to go to heaven, not be a follower or a leader.
@nekoboy86 never have as many followers as Rinpoche? well at least you admit that he desires his personal gain. i dont want followers as i said in my last messages...'read'(?).
so keep following Rinpoche and 'be shown' where it leads, in your unawareness you forgot your sight ^^.
@daenumen no matter how intelligent you are, you will NEVER have as many followers as Rinpoche. Save your breath and start your own center or write your own book.
@nekoboy86 however, the initial part WAS for sake of his ego, i KNOW you wont respond constructively, there is no EGO gain for me (to use the terms he has taught you, that you might understand, though fain shall you, for his constructs were erroneous.).
its clear you have very little understanding of these things, or how to formalise a debate. i would recommend that you go and read what buddha wrote and find who enlightens by his light. afterall, buddha himself was enlightened. then talk.
@nekoboy86 instead of trying to gain 'apparent' face by defacing others (as i have mentioned your method) why not gain some actual face by being constructive.
i made several constructive points initially that you responded to, and i made constructive points that this person can work upon. if i were trying to deface him i would have pointed out his incorrect grammar and spelling. i did not.
as someone who takes guidance from a misguided person like himself, i dont expect you to understand.
Thank you for your sharing and teaching. Greatly appreciate your teaching.
guyneo 1 month ago
@wanwaimeng i have detailed in my intial posts ( a series of posts commentary to your video) in which i detail where you have made self-contradictions in your words.
i do however agree philosophically with the comments you make in the last few minutes of the video, i think from 18 mins in.
these comments were made 1month ago.
read them, id be happy to discuss them with you.
daenumen 10 months ago
@daenumen Hi, i'm kind of lost in the discussions, would you like to clarify?
wanwaimeng 10 months ago
@nekoboy86 "and by being forceful and very rude and disrespectful about your theories, which you will also deny, where or what do you hope to get?" -- this is a question aimed at yourself, i wont deny that...
perhaps in your unawareness you have fallen into the darkness.
i made a some points based on the facts of the video. then i concluded with advice. that is 'polite'. again i also mentioned in my last posts this (read). i want to go to heaven, not be a follower or a leader.
daenumen 1 year ago
@nekoboy86 never have as many followers as Rinpoche? well at least you admit that he desires his personal gain. i dont want followers as i said in my last messages...'read'(?).
so keep following Rinpoche and 'be shown' where it leads, in your unawareness you forgot your sight ^^.
daenumen 1 year ago
@daenumen and by being forceful and very rude and disrespectful about your theories, which you will also deny, where or what do you hope to get?
nekoboy86 1 year ago
hmm. looks like i provoke an e-philosopher...
*keeps quiet*
nekoboy86 1 year ago
@daenumen no matter how intelligent you are, you will NEVER have as many followers as Rinpoche. Save your breath and start your own center or write your own book.
nekoboy86 1 year ago
@nekoboy86 however, the initial part WAS for sake of his ego, i KNOW you wont respond constructively, there is no EGO gain for me (to use the terms he has taught you, that you might understand, though fain shall you, for his constructs were erroneous.).
its clear you have very little understanding of these things, or how to formalise a debate. i would recommend that you go and read what buddha wrote and find who enlightens by his light. afterall, buddha himself was enlightened. then talk.
daenumen 1 year ago
@nekoboy86 instead of trying to gain 'apparent' face by defacing others (as i have mentioned your method) why not gain some actual face by being constructive.
i made several constructive points initially that you responded to, and i made constructive points that this person can work upon. if i were trying to deface him i would have pointed out his incorrect grammar and spelling. i did not.
as someone who takes guidance from a misguided person like himself, i dont expect you to understand.
daenumen 1 year ago