Google Tech Talks
February 19, 2009
ABSTRACT
Slides for this talk are available at:
http://www.slideshare.net/g...
Speaker: David LeBlanc
David's Ph.d in physics was completed at University of O...
Speaker: David LeBlanc David's Ph.d in physics was completed at University of Ottawa (1998) on high temperature superconductors. During this period, he developed a great interest to pursue both fission and fusion reactor design basics, which separately cumulated in a long term fellowship from the Canadian Fusion Fuels Technology Project (later ITER Canada) for his work on the use of high Tc superconductors in the fusion field and also work for Atomic Energy of Canada Limited on worldwide reactor design comparisons. Since then he has been teaching at the Carleton University physics department and continued his investigations primarily in the field of Molten Salt Reactors, also known as Liquid Fluoride Reactors. David founded Ottawa Valley Research Associates Ltd to expand these efforts and has completed a license agreement with a European firm with a goal of development of a new generation of Molten Salt Reactors.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Another thorium nut. Folks, gez wot...there are no thorium reactors operating anywhere on THIS planet today. Nukers are insane. Fusion power is more likely and they actually are building a power plant in France.
Thorium itself can not be turned into a bomb We have a thousand years worth of it we know how to use it We get it when we dig up rare earth metals for all the electric motors for all the electric cars
I've been a lifelong skeptic of nuclear power but climate change really forces all of us to look really hard at nuclear power.
I still hate pressurized reactors and I'm not enthusiastic at all about pebble bed reactors.
This reactor, the liquid flouride thorium reactor is the only fission reactor I can see playing a big role in the future BUT at the end of the day a lot of these reactors mean a lot of dirty bombs for bad people.
That is just not true. Dirty bomb is something that you scare children with. A chemical bomb is more efficient and far easier to make so why bother with a dirty bomb?
A terrorist bothers with a dirty bomb because if it is done right it makes a lot of people sick and it tears society apart with fear which is what was accomplished on 9/11.
David LeBlanc in this talk projects a need for "thousands" of these kinds of reactors. That's a lot of targets that will need to be hardened against being hijacked and used as a dirty bomb by terrorists.
I like this solution to our energy and climate change problems but you should never discount the security concerns.
Irrational fear in the society is not really a security problem but an education problem. Radiation is not as dangerous as they tried to make us believe during the cold war (when russia was todays terrorist threat).
A power plant is basically impossible to make in to dirty bomb of any kind. And even if they steal the material it's not that easy to do it. Cars release more dangerous particles every day than any dirty bomb could.
This has been tested over and over again(as in taking a chunk of Cs-137, Pu-238 or Sr-90 and blowing it in various configurations of high explosives over a grid of detectors out in the desert to see where the dust goes).
With any kind of realistic device far fewer will die from radiation than from the explosion and few if any from accute radiation poisoning. If people were rational the 100 that die in an explosion are a bigger tragedy than the 10 that might die from cancer in 20 years.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Folks, gez wot...there are no thorium reactors operating anywhere on THIS planet today.
Nukers are insane.
Fusion power is more likely and they actually are building a power plant in France.
Thorium is the future of energy!
We have a thousand years worth of it
we know how to use it
We get it when we dig up rare earth metals for all the electric motors for all the electric cars
It's really the only big way forward
I still hate pressurized reactors and I'm not enthusiastic at all about pebble bed reactors.
This reactor, the liquid flouride thorium reactor is the only fission reactor I can see playing a big role in the future BUT at the end of the day a lot of these reactors mean a lot of dirty bombs for bad people.
David LeBlanc in this talk projects a need for "thousands" of these kinds of reactors. That's a lot of targets that will need to be hardened against being hijacked and used as a dirty bomb by terrorists.
I like this solution to our energy and climate change problems but you should never discount the security concerns.
A power plant is basically impossible to make in to dirty bomb of any kind. And even if they steal the material it's not that easy to do it. Cars release more dangerous particles every day than any dirty bomb could.
The proponents of the LFTR by the way are planning to site plants underground or even underwater (like a nuke sub) to address NRC regulations.
With any kind of realistic device far fewer will die from radiation than from the explosion and few if any from accute radiation poisoning. If people were rational the 100 that die in an explosion are a bigger tragedy than the 10 that might die from cancer in 20 years.