Turn down the lights
Turn up the lights
Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea

Google Tech Talks February 19, 2009 ABSTRACT Slides for this talk are available at: http://www.slideshare.net/g... Speaker: David LeBlanc David's Ph.d in physics was completed at University of O...  
 
Customize

More From: googletechtalks

Sounding the Stars with Genetic Algorithms1:00:09
7,048 views
The Palestinian Perspective:  What the World Looks Like from the West Bank an...1:19:02
9,447 views
Self-Organization: The Secret Sauce for Improving your Scrum team1:33:20
16,658 views
Amdahl's Law in the Multicore Era52:53
10,456 views
Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Prob59:50
4,478 views
Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...1:32:43
22,290 views
Life's Too Short - Write Fast Code (part 2)55:52
33,203 views
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactor1:22:09
8,940 views
My own solar system: Installing solar panels at my house1:00:06
93,383 views
"Science and the taboo of psi" with Dean Radin1:34:57
68,090 views
JavaScript: The Good Parts1:03:47
46,922 views
How Open Source Projects Survive Poisonous People (And...54:58
117,513 views
Using Engineering Principles To Study and Manipulate Biologi49:25
2,694 views
Why Physicists Need the Large Hadron Collider1:27:54
17,681 views
Wireless Mesh Networks and the Smart Grid50:42
5,583 views
The History of NASA Ames50:03
4,330 views
C++ Mocks Made Easy - An Introduction to gMock54:36
5,625 views
Turning the Pages of an eBook - Realistic Electronic Books34:25
5,740 views
Google Personal Growth Series: Mindsight: The New Science of1:02:52
16,205 views
Microgrids: Providing Energy Services Locally1:01:59
3,422 views

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
48 ratings
Sign in to rate
7,791 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (29)   Options

Loading...
joedoves (5 months ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
longbeachboy57 (4 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
For my entire life I have been promised fusion power "within the next five years".

Thorium is the future of energy!
longbeachboy57 (4 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Btw, I googled for that fusion reactor in France. It is another experimental reactor!!!
simondina (6 months ago) Show Hide
+5
Marked as spam
Thorium itself can not be turned into a bomb
We have a thousand years worth of it
we know how to use it
We get it when we dig up rare earth metals for all the electric motors for all the electric cars

It's really the only big way forward
brookwoodt (7 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
I've been a lifelong skeptic of nuclear power but climate change really forces all of us to look really hard at nuclear power.

I still hate pressurized reactors and I'm not enthusiastic at all about pebble bed reactors.

This reactor, the liquid flouride thorium reactor is the only fission reactor I can see playing a big role in the future BUT at the end of the day a lot of these reactors mean a lot of dirty bombs for bad people.
f2o9x8 (7 months ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
That is just not true. Dirty bomb is something that you scare children with. A chemical bomb is more efficient and far easier to make so why bother with a dirty bomb?
brookwoodt (7 months ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
A terrorist bothers with a dirty bomb because if it is done right it makes a lot of people sick and it tears society apart with fear which is what was accomplished on 9/11.

David LeBlanc in this talk projects a need for "thousands" of these kinds of reactors. That's a lot of targets that will need to be hardened against being hijacked and used as a dirty bomb by terrorists.

I like this solution to our energy and climate change problems but you should never discount the security concerns.
f2o9x8 (7 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Irrational fear in the society is not really a security problem but an education problem. Radiation is not as dangerous as they tried to make us believe during the cold war (when russia was todays terrorist threat).

A power plant is basically impossible to make in to dirty bomb of any kind. And even if they steal the material it's not that easy to do it. Cars release more dangerous particles every day than any dirty bomb could.
brookwoodt (7 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Impossible? Then convey that conviction to the NRC which now requires all nuclear power plants to be hardened against impact from an aircraft.

The proponents of the LFTR by the way are planning to site plants underground or even underwater (like a nuke sub) to address NRC regulations.
soylentgreenb (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
This has been tested over and over again(as in taking a chunk of Cs-137, Pu-238 or Sr-90 and blowing it in various configurations of high explosives over a grid of detectors out in the desert to see where the dust goes).

With any kind of realistic device far fewer will die from radiation than from the explosion and few if any from accute radiation poisoning. If people were rational the 100 that die in an explosion are a bigger tragedy than the 10 that might die from cancer in 20 years.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.