Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

True News 12: Statism is Dead - Part 2

The non-prosecution of George W. Bush for murder, and what it means for the moral and practical authority of statism. http://www.freedomainradio.com  
 
Customize
Series (69)
More From Channel

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to True News 11: Statism is Dead - Part 1
265 ratings
Sign in to rate
11,320 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (153)   Options

Loading...
netlethe (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Is it Now at Last becoming clear to America that democracy is Not an option any longer ... ???
We all live within Corporations Great Britain Corp .. Homeland Security Corp ... we actually live within Maritime Law in Admiralty Jurisdiction !! FACT .. our countries are trading Us, the people .. our lives, our labour .. through Bonds .. OUR Bonds
Check out .. youtubedotcom/freemanshrout
Peace.
ambj219 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The first vid in this series (outstanding) had me psyhed up, and this delivered on a more level plane... I am now in the zone. Thanks, I needed this, tonight. Somehow I always find, rather they find me, things I'd forgotten I was looking for.
ks100001 (2 months ago)
Comment removed by author
bobbygnosis (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'd like to point out that under Bush the government got a lot bigger. Many in the Right Wing speak of smaller government, but the practice is the opposite. Look at the policies of "both parties" and you'll see the exact same proceedures and rhetoric - carefully delineated to appear as Real Choice.

Make no mistake. The only difference between Obama's policies and Bush's are that one happened before the other. We simply watched the puppet show change characters.

Read more. Think more.
Rhetorikol (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
To attack Bush you must attack all of his conspirators, otherwise they go on. Bush is only a face to a larger force, whom works in the background through various organizations and loopholes. If anything, the President is a sacrifice and expendable.
bobbygnosis (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
You speak reason.

The name of the expendable creature is "cat's paw." The aphorism is about a monkey the wants something in a fire and uses a cat's paw to get the thing. The monkey is unscathed while the cat is expendable.

In Obama's cabinet it would be wise to consider that while Cheney was CFR so is Michelle Obama - both board of directors. What about the Federal Reserve? Goldman Sachs? Look into the financial/corporate links and you'll find a sudden desire for a stiff drink.

Peace.
verstwo2 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'm not sure what you mean. There are other parties but none that are viable. OR are you trying to say there both the same party and the choice between them is an illusion? I've considered that concept and find it in itself to be an illusion, created in part to disfranchise the electorate.
bobbygnosis (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Indeed. There can only be two. Two choices. You must either be one or the other. The whole of human thought can be expressed within the confines of the n"two" parties: Republican or Democrat.

If you do not agree that clearly means that the other person is the opposite of you. What else could there possibly be?

You logic is truly admirable. By God I wish that you were head of our noble government. You would oust the ___s from their seats and show us how good the ___s are.

Cheers.
verstwo2 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I didn't say there were only two choices. I said there are only two viable choices, and what I should have added was 'currently in America'.

It is the anti-statists position that there are only two choices (state or anarchy) and makes no distinction between different types of states. 'All states are evil' is an absolute claim I find nauseatingly simplistic.

I hope that your right wing philosophy never gains control of the government again. Anarchy is as far right as it gets.
bobbygnosis (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Right wing? Are you joking?

If it weren't coming from you I'd be insulted at being accused of "right wing."

I'd like to note that you use the qualifier "currently in America." Doesn't that kind of tell you that the whole thing is a big pile of crap? We have to pretend that these parties are really important so that we have something to vote for. When really the only thing we're voting for is whether we get peed on or shat on.

Personally, I think Right and Left are constructs for babies.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.