Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
In the tournament finals which india has won sachin averages 99, he has made 5 hundreds in the tournament finals (most by any player) and India have won all of them. After this if someone says he is not a match winner he is not accepting the reality.
sachin has most man of the match awards (57) in the whole history of the game.You will say he has most no.of matches also, so here is the reply
sachin played 425 matches and have 57 man of the match awards. Wasim akam has played 356 matches and 22 man of the match awards. ponting has 315 matches and 28 man of the match awards. lara has 299 matches and 30 man of the match awards. gilchrist has 287 matches and 28 man of the match awards.
if u can say something so utterly stupid and childish...well ,then...the only conclusion is that you have never actually played cricket in your life. check out the opinion of the guys who have: benaud,woodcock,lara,waugh(s), inzy,jaya,sanga,ponting,donald ,akram,warne,bradman.........z zzzzzzzz..... then get your petty regional jealousy out of your system... and try to appreciate genius, bcoz ur comment reveal your own ignorance
Wow, i wish indian team had you as a selector who prefers chosin players with the ability of winning 25% of matches. LMAO! Well, i now understand your mentality. Shouldn't have debated with you in first place.
Please dont "laugh your ass off" since most of your brains seem to be there in the first place. can you tell me which player in history (keep aside bradman) is capable of winning 25% of matches almost singlehandedly? Like i said: your fundamental lack of understanding of sport seems to be the problem
ability of winning 25% matches??? are you barking??? matches are won by 11 people.. very rarely they are won singlehandedly, and that too happens only in a single innings.. you guys dont want to enjoy these videos, u ciew them and then criticize one word-- STAY AWAY dont spoil our viewing pleasure you're just jealous
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
After this if someone says he is not a match winner he is not accepting the reality.
sachin played 425 matches and have 57 man of the match awards.
Wasim akam has played 356 matches and 22 man of the match awards.
ponting has 315 matches and 28 man of the match awards.
lara has 299 matches and 30 man of the match awards.
gilchrist has 287 matches and 28 man of the match awards.
this will give you some idea.
In the matches India has won sachin average is 57 and 32 in the lost matches. sachin has most match winning hundreds than any other player (31).
Sachin has 10,140 runs in the matches india has won at an average of 57, most match winning runs by any player in the history of the game.
In second innings sachin has 16 hundreds and india has won 14 of them
check out the opinion of the guys who have:
benaud,woodcock,lara,waugh(s), inzy,jaya,sanga,ponting,donald ,akram,warne,bradman.........z zzzzzzzz.....
then get your petty regional jealousy out of your system...
and try to appreciate genius, bcoz ur comment reveal your own ignorance
LMAO!
Well, i now understand your mentality. Shouldn't have debated with you in first place.
since most of your brains seem to be there in the first place.
can you tell me which player in history (keep aside bradman) is capable of winning 25% of matches almost singlehandedly?
Like i said: your fundamental lack of understanding of sport seems to be the problem
are you barking???
matches are won by 11 people.. very rarely they are won singlehandedly, and that too happens only in a single innings..
you guys dont want to enjoy these videos, u ciew them and then criticize
one word-- STAY AWAY
dont spoil our viewing pleasure
you're just jealous