Richard Gage, AIA - at the office of NIST
Top Comments
All Comments (102)
-
What contempt they must have for all of us us to dare to tell us to believe that the building fell down in 6 seconds because of office fires.
-
Having been a peer reviewer and having been peer reviewed, the reason for it is to make sure not just any old crack pot theory gets published. Much like the BS AE911'truth' advocates.
-
how the fuck does this guy keep a straight face? Just the fact that NIST did not test for explosives when it was clearly the procedural mandate based on the levels of destruction. But they didnt do that. When asked why they said; 'It would be a waste of time to look for something that ins't there.' How do you know it isnt there if you dont test for it. next..
Of course Sunder & Gross are not gonna meet a bunch of silly 'conspiracy theorists' time would be better spent covering up for mass murder
-
NIST admitted free-fall acceleration of WTC 7 in their "final" report, yet they still maintain that laws of physics do not apply by virtue of their continued contradiction to their own evidence! These huge lies go uncontested by people who R so ignorant as to believe everything their government tells them - sheep going to slaughter, which is what they are! Wake up America! Call for a new, impartial investigation with power of subpoena into ALL events of 9/11 if you can handle the truth.
-
Time is up folks! Everyone knows 9/11 was an inside job. The hold-outs are those sheep who get their information from mainstream media news which are all owned & sponsored by war-for-profit corporations (banks, arms manufacturers, etc.). The problem is that these sheep are in complete denial concerning the the steps these corps will take in order to perpetuate the war business. They don't care who they kill, they own our politicians, they control elections. Americans are waking up. Long overdue!
-
@ZapruderJr Yet Gage has not been published in ANY journal not part of the Truth movement. In other words, the ones that agree with his conclusion.
What was that about circular reasoning?
-
@ZapruderJr Gaga claims to be a scientist, yet refuses to meet even the most basic scientific standard. Basically, he wants a double standard applied to him.
The flat-earth thing went out of vogue in Ptolemy's time. Even by 1492, most people who could read knew earth was round.
The thing about the scientific method is that it has to produce repeatable results. If someone can do the same thing you did, and get the same results, you're right.
-
@ZapruderJr Actually, a Truther paper was published in an allegedly peer-reviewed journal. Truthers rejoiced. The editor at the time actually resigned, since they said they had never seen the paper before publishing. Then someone sent in a nonsense paper by non-existent writers, from a non-existent institute, yet they were willing to publish once payment was made.
And now Truthers scoff at the highfalutin concept of "peer-review", and pretend that previous fiasco never happened.
I hate all this garbage I hear about 'peer review'...
1. Evidence is evidence
2. How is 'peer review' objective or trustworthy when you control the process? It's like the old joke about the country club where you can't apply to join unless you're already a member...
ZapruderJr 2 years ago 15
Does anyone see the "pentagon" pin on his lapel??? FREEMASON symbology...
A pentagon is the base for a pentagram!
a pentagram is a symbol for the "5 points of fellowship"
He is a FREEMASON and is NOT going to meet with you or listen to your TRUTHS...
AE911truth is one of my favorites...
The time for talking is over... they will NEVER talk to you! They do the talking with no rebuttles. Just how a slave owner talks to a slave...
CastingStonez 2 years ago 13