Is the Universe Too Precise to Be Randomly Formed?

Dr. William Lane Craig explains briefly how the universe is way too precise to be randomly formed. I challenge you to research this subject more.

Go to www.leestrobel.com for hundreds of other excellent FREE Christian videos.

Todd Tyszka
www.toddtyszka.com



lee strobel Dr. william lane craig debate debated debating universe too precise precision random randomly creation created formed Intelligent Design ID atheist agnostic skeptic evolution apologist apologetic apologetics big bang Creation Genesis evolution perfect precise Jesus Christ God spoke

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• lee
• strobel
• Dr.
• william
• lane
• craig
• debate
• debated
• debating
• universe
• too
• precise
• precision
• random
• randomly
• creation
• created
• formed
• Intelligent
• Design
• ID
• atheist
• agnostic
• skeptic
• evolution
• apologist
• apologetic
• apologetics
• big
• bang
• Creation
• Genesis
• perfect
• Jesus
• Christ
• God
• spoke

[tafftastic]

@aaronk1994 He studies Philosophy., Theology and Communications!!! Since when has this s made him a scientist, or qualified to talk about science in an informed manner.

Yet another creationist fail.

[venomfanex]

@TooManyTights That’s an outright lie - unless you include the fact he may have read a book or two he has no formal qualifications whatsoever in the topic that he claim s to be an expert on and is talking about. Typical creationist lies yet again. This guy is not qualified to talk about the subject in hand presenting himself as an authority in any way – period.

[AratoSlayer]

@Pythagoras211 Dr. Craig has a website filled with more compelling arguments both scientific and philosophical called reasonablefaith(dot)org if you're interested.

[Pythagoras211]

I'm an agnostic, but this actually seems like quite a bit of evidence for the existence of God. I'm not trying to debate anybody, but can anybody actually inform me of an objection to the statement he's making? A legitimate one, you know like the arguments that have flaws but still get put in textbooks. Anyone?

[MsOluwatoyin]

@venomfanex I'm sorry..Try to prove what,to teh contrary?I can't find any previous commentary to you,from me..

[venomfanex]

@MsOluwatoyin Absolutely. Feel free to attempt to prove otherwise.

[MsOluwatoyin]

@tafftastic Lastly,you said:"All he is left with are his own personal opinions, which are not based in fact. Much the same as all 'beliefs' - they’re not evidence based." Do you,believe this??

[MsOluwatoyin]

@tafftastic Should he speak,with his tail between his legs,when touching on a topic,in which he hasn't a degree in?He's in a debate..Debates,are competitive,usually..So,it would hardly,do for him,to even participate in the talk,if he isn't allowed to present his ideas,with confidence.Which claims,did he make,that are opposed by scientists?

[tafftastic]

@MsOluwatoyin The issue in hand is the fact he presents himself as talking from a position of authority, when he has none, and that the facts he claims to be presenting as truth are diametrically opposed by those people who are actually qualified with the subject matter he purports to be knowledgeable about. All he is left with are his own personal opinions, which are not based in fact. Much the same as all 'beliefs' - they’re not evidence based.

[wakuzaki]

hes whole debate can be invalidated by the size of universe, the chance of us being alone is 0.0000000000000000001%

[MsOluwatoyin]

@tafftastic se our our degrees aren't in these fields..If this is so,my next question,would be,why did we learn these things at all?(Since we're not allowed to use them in discussions or elsewhere in life)That he doesn't have any degrees in sciences or maths,is not a good enough reason to dismiss his argument,as invalid.You would only be justified in doing so,if what he is saying,is wrong..These,are not false scientific facts,sorry to say..

[MsOluwatoyin]

@tafftastic In effect,you're saying,that a person shouldn't speak on film or cuisine,if they don't own filming studios,or if they aren't themselves,chefs..These are,poor objections here..My degree,isn't in mathematics,yet,i am able to speak on a great deal of mathematics,at expert level..Dr,Craig,is using sophomoric science,to make his point..Are,we not allowed to use what portions of mathematics and science,we did learn in school,or through reading science magazines,in discussions,simply becau