Upload

MC Hawking - What We Need More Of Is Science

therealmchawking therealmchawking·3 videos
425

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
373,904
Like     Dislike 124

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like therealmchawking's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike therealmchawking's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add therealmchawking's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Feb 13, 2007

The official video for the song "What We Need More of Is Science" by MC Hawking from the album "A Brief Histroy of Rhyme"

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Gunnjón Gestsson

    Don't be silly. MC Hawking wears glasses while Dr.Astro does not.

    · 96

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gunnjón Gestsson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gunnjón Gestsson's comment.
    in reply to fjccommish (Show the comment)
  • Zebachi

    To be fair any atheist who says that he/she has found the "truth" is a fool, there are many questions that remain unanswered and science is all about trying to find answers to these questions. However with every question that gets answered several more questions will appear, making a neverending persuit of knowledge. It's fine to admit that we don't know everything however just because we don't know something doesn't mean that we need to make up stories about an invisible man in the sky.

    · 12

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zebachi's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zebachi's comment.
    in reply to PuppyStalker (Show the comment)

All Comments (942)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • joinmarch76

    Oh, so he went for the Clark Kent approach to superheroing? Go figure.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate joinmarch76's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate joinmarch76's comment.
    in reply to Gunnjón Gestsson (Show the comment)
  • Chris Adam-Connor

    And, lastly, if you have any illusions people know how to think naturally, take and give them the Wason Selection Task

    philosophyexperiments dotcom /wason/

    Or google it. A simple, 10-60sec one-question quiz that proves 90%+ of people can't even get basic, intro-level, logic right in a simple question where you simply need to flip over cards.

    You can't reason without an understanding of logic you can have thoughts of course but... yeah. 90% fail the 1-1=0 level of logic, as proven by Wason.

    

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Adam-Connor's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Adam-Connor's comment.
    in reply to Chris Adam-Connor (Show the comment)
  • Chris Adam-Connor

    That's not even counting deductive atheology.

    For example, you can prove there exist no object which is both "Round" and "Square" because they're mutually exclusive properties. I can prove there are no beings which are all-just and all-merciful. You can't disprove the supernatural, but you can disprove instances of it. I.E. Someones concept of a God.

    Of course, they won't go, "You're right, my beliefs are foolish", they're ignore the problem or edit their god to fix that. But dumb is dumb.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Adam-Connor's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Adam-Connor's comment.
    in reply to Chris Adam-Connor (Show the comment)
  • Chris Adam-Connor

    You obviously know nothing of logic or science; are a sophist trying to feel special.

    I mean that dumb, "God of the Gaps" style argument there. There are fewer questions when you find out stuff, not more. Knowing more and asking different questions doesn't mean there's a never ending pursuit. There is a total limit of discoverable knowledge within the universe.

    Educate yourself.

    Wikipedia:Logic

    nibien.blogspot.com/2011/05/du­nning-kruger-effect.html nibien.blogspot.com/2011/10/lo­gic.html

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Adam-Connor's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chris Adam-Connor's comment.
    in reply to Zebachi (Show the comment)
  • ShakmeteMalik

    The lyric "the conclusion foregone" is used in relation to the dismissal of belief.based on the (Judeo-Christian) Bible. That is not how science operates. It would be like saying "Einstein's Theory of Relativity is correct because it adequately explains the functioning of the universe" is a foregone conclusion. Without actually doing testing to examine whether something is or is not correct, there can be no conclusions. Nothing can be 'foregone,' except in fundamentalist interpretation.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ShakmeteMalik's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ShakmeteMalik's comment.
    in reply to Carl Sagan (Show the comment)
  • Chibling

    Fundamentals of science: logic, evidence and reason. Fundamentals of religion: faith AKA gullibility.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chibling's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chibling's comment.
    in reply to ShakmeteMalik (Show the comment)
  • suitov

    Is it incredibly sad that my first thought on the first glimpse of The Fundamentalist was "hey, they drew him in HeroMachine!"?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate suitov's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate suitov's comment.
  • Carl Sagan

    hardly. dogmatic belief in facts and logic?

    so whata

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Carl Sagan's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Carl Sagan's comment.
    in reply to ShakmeteMalik (Show the comment)
  • bryony

    bad production

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bryony's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bryony's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later