Pt 2/4 Jon Stewart interviewed on The Rachel Maddow Show 11/11/10 - MSNBC

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,870
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 11, 2010

http://researchris.blogspot.com
http://freedomwatchonfox.com/
http://readrepublicmag.blogspot.com/
http://infowars.com

Watch Richard Gage's 2 hr presentation "9/11: Blueprint for Truth" using the scientific method to show that the 3 WTC towers could NOT have collapsed straight down at near free fall speed because of fires or structural damage. IF YOU ARE A SKEPTIC, THEN THIS VIDEO IS A MUST WATCH.

Click the link below to watch for free:
http://researchris.blogspot.com/2009/07/911-blueprint-for-truth-scientific.html

http://AE911Truth.org 's Mission Statement:

" To research and to disseminate the truth
of the 9/11 collapses of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings
to every architect and engineer. "

READ and DOWNLOAD REPUBLIC MAGAZINES now for FREE
http://readrepublicmag.blogspot.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The difference between MSNBC and FOX is this: FOX lies all day long, and MSNBC tries to correct all of the lies that FOX told yesterday. There is no moral equivalence.

  • i want johns shoes, plus these disagreements between Rachel and Jon are so minuscule compared to the massive distance between corporate interest and the rest of american society I think.

see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @torontoBluejays87 lol have you seen chris matthews and ed shultz?

  • @jumpoutatree i know this is a year old comment but i digress. you only say that because you a probably liberal and you already have a bias for MSNBC. the same could be said for the FOX news watcher who is a conservative. both of those networks are there for propaganda and tell you what you want to hear to further spread an agenda.

  • I love these 2 people so much, and their slight divide makes me love them that much more. Rachel let him have the stage on her own show and just go off on a philosophical level, even though he was criticizing her network and her bosses. I am admittedly very liberal, but the mutual respect here is what we need to see more of in all news media. I have actually enjoyed Bill O'Reilly from time to time, but his interviews versus liberals are just startlingly rude and overbearing. He has no respect.

  • @TobyTheRobot They could say that, but they'd be lying.

  • @jumpoutatree you realize that conservatives would say the exact same thing about MSNBC, right? "The difference between MSNBC and FOX is this: MSNBC lies all day long, and FOX tries to correct all of the lies that MSNBC told yesterday. There is no moral equivalence."

  • I think the point might not be who's right and who's wrong in this debate

    I think the very obvious point is WHY do newschannels, in a country about as free as any, deliver the same news in totally different ways? I think that we may all be fighting a way over just that right in the middle east ...

    Regardless of your political agenda, isn't that what this is all about? Legitimacy?

    Maybe I am deranged, but that is what I am thinking ....

  • @alexworksfromhome99 Exactly... Sometimes they need to tone down the way they deliver their counters to FOX.. Otherwise they risk the possibility of being viewed as ONLY being just 'anti-FOX'...

  • @jumpoutatree Well said.... MSNBC are the 'janitors' of US News Media...

  • @jumpoutatree Instead you make the opposite fallacy: it's black vs. white.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more