2010 F-150 Lariat 5.4 liter with a Magnaflow cat-back exhaust system part # 16612

Just a quick video showing the exhaust tone of my old F-150 with a Magnaflow catback stainless steel exhaust system. 2010 F-150 Lariat, 5.4 liter, 4x4, Platinum White, Crew Cab.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• F-150
• 2010
• 2009
• Ford
• F150
• exhaust
• muffler
• magnaflow
• magna
• flow
• dynomax
• mbrp
• flowmaster
• sound

[alrightythan1]

So this is a catback 2.5 or just a muffler

[langford2002]

@alrightythan1

It is their cat back system, magnaflow part #16612

[alrightythan1]

K thx I was asking early because I was headed to the muffler shop I'm now sitting here at the shop waiting for my truck getting the same setup on my 2010 fx4

[alrightythan1]

So this is probably a catback 2.5' right?

[sancho721]

and also im about to be done paying this truck off, only about a year left, im thinking twice about commiting another 4 or 5 years and I have also put a few thousand dollars into my truck so i would loose that money too.... but damn those trucks are tempting

[sancho721]

@langford2002 true that. It is built to withstand the turbos and extra torque, I am only 24 years old but in my family we are used to take care of our cars and keep then untill they fall apart, my dad still has his '86 F-150. And my worry couold be repair costs. but thinking about it what it would save in gas would make it up. Im still debating, im gonna go test drive them both and compare it to my 5.4. the 5.4 is good, it does what i ask it to do and then some, with no problems. i do love it

[langford2002]

@sancho721

Oh, and my brother LOVES his 6.2. He got the '11 Limited, and it is a damn nice truck. The 6.2 runs well, and sounds like a beast...plus I'm sure it has a ton of potential if you want to make some more HP. He hasn't towed with it, so I'm not sure what the mileage would be...but I can tell you it wont be great. He only averages 12 mpg with mixed city and highway driving.

[langford2002]

@sancho721

I'm not too worried about the longevity of the EB, it was designed for the turbos and built as a workhorse...check out the "ecoboost torture test" videos if you are worried about it being fragile. And with the torque curve of the EB, it will pull better than any v8 in a half ton...very diesel like. Some engines have more peak hp and torque, but that's not what you need while towing ...look at the dyno charts of the 6.2 vs the EB, the 6.2 only pulls ahead way up in the RPM range.

[sancho721]

@langford2002 that is what i was affraid off, that the engine will struggle and make boost and put a lot of strain on the engine, and with time will wear down faster that the other engines. you can get the locker on the lariat with the 6.2 it is an option, it will work same as the FX4. how does ur bro like that 6.2??? and like i have said, the trucks are not for racing but towin and hauling, so speed will not concern me much.

[langford2002]

@sancho721

Unloaded, the ecoboost is great...good mileage, amazing power, and very quiet. Loaded, it pulls my trailer (24x8.5 enclosed, over 7,000lbs loaded up) better than my 5.4 could have dreamed of. Unfortunately, I only get about 8mpg. Part of that is my fault because I went with the 4.10 rear end and added 33" MT's, but I'm still not thrilled about 8mpg. Being a v6 with twin turbos, it is constantly making boost to keep up at highway speeds, which drinks the fuel down.