Post Debate Analysis

From the debate auditorium.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Youtube
• debate
• 2008
• democratic
• cnn
• president
• presidential
• election
• youchoose
• james
• kotecki
• google
• charleston

[roberto8ag]

And the way to deal with this threat is...

[jyddbsf]

How will the Democrats defeat this determined enemy?

Islamic Fascist want to convert America to Islam, or make us slaves, or kill us to achieve an Islamic State. Negotiating with them will not change their minds or stop them from making war. On the contrary, appeasement is victory to our enemy no matter how small the concession.

[Dragginballz]

what happened to the afterparty videos? lol. too sloshed? :-)

lush

[arielcay]

Ginger: You should consider making a video to voice your opinions. YouTube is great to get debates going. I would look forward to seeing it! :)

[gingermax]

Hey Rudy, how did you know the towers were coming down? Did you marry your cousin because she would let you wear womans clothing? Boxers, briefs or pink women's panties? Rudy, how can you sleep at night? Do the dead haunt you? Do you see bodies falling out of the sky in your dreams? I am posting here because YouTube censors anything negative about Rudy under his videos. Thats why there are no posts under most of his videos.

[arielcay]

I'm not for or against any candidate at the moment but I was making a statement based on Gravel's presentation (and only this presentation) at the YouTube debates. It would be nice to hear what Gravel has to say on a variety of issues ESPECIALLY his stances on campaign spending. Fact is, plenty of things ANGER us to a point where we feel the need to rant as he did... but we don't. He really should just learn to control himself and that's my only point I was trying to make.

[utubesucks2003]

If there is a point behind the hostility I don't mind. Stuff he said when he had his small time frame was relatable to things discussed and wasn't given a chance to, he was fighting for his time and it was compelling, Obama and others like to curtail their answers too--its still not clear about his bundles for example. Anyway I just like that someone is there to put top tiers in check. I actually am going to vote for Ron Paul, whom I'm sure youd have a harder time criticising.

[arielcay]

Someone asks him a question and then he goes ranting and raving about another candidate about a completely unrelated subject. Frankly, it has little to do with his truthfulness and more to do with his inability to control his bouts of rage. Why would we want someone for president who can't control his emotions like a civil human being? Is this too much to ask for? I'm all for someone having PASSION but there is a fine line between PASSION and HOSTILITY.

[utubesucks2003]

Yeah when people tell the truth they are being bad sports. This is a fight for the presidency everything should be laid down on the table.

[arielcay]

I actually disagree. If Gravel would just calm down a bit and stop outwardly attacking his fellow democrats, they would probably have let him answer a great deal more. Every time he was given the opportunity, he would cause controversy. He was just a bad sport overall.