@TheScienceFoundation The miller experiment failed abysmally, it lacked INFORMATION and CHIRALITY!! You always have Racemic Mixtures! A primordial broth never produces INFORMATION, Space crystals and meteorites have never shown INFORMATION! Excesses are still racemic mixtures!! with no CHIRALITY!!!!!!
@5tonyvvvv I'll keep pointing out that ignorance of facts such as processes that affect handedness of life and that Miller's experiments were recently vindicated is not a valid argument.
@TheScienceFoundation Once again you are a MORON!! abiogenesis is chemically and mathematically impossible! and szostak creates NOTHING!! He borrows and rearranges pre existing INFORMATION to get his reactions going!!!!
@TheScienceFoundation It has NOTHING to do with origin of life! and abiogenesis! abiogenesis is IMPOSSIBLE!! Stanley Miller proved that almost 60 years ago!
@TheScienceFoundation LOL..Ok szostak puts raw chemicals and molecules in test tubes and lets them self organize into protocells, all by undirected natural processes!
Szostak's starting materials and INFORMATION is always taken from other sources and he uses TEMPLATES!
Szostak has not successfully created any sort of self replicating living molecule from scratch!!!!
@TheScienceFoundation Szostak's "protocells" are not being created! Szostak's staring materials always consist of templates and INFORMATION taken from other living sources! Szostak is proving that it takes INTELLIGENCE to copy and borrow, and rearrange the blueprints GOD created in the first place!!!!
@5tonyvvvv Once again, ignoring the fat that there are processes which affect chirality is not a valid argument.
TheScienceFoundation 7 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation The miller experiment failed abysmally, it lacked INFORMATION and CHIRALITY!! You always have Racemic Mixtures! A primordial broth never produces INFORMATION, Space crystals and meteorites have never shown INFORMATION! Excesses are still racemic mixtures!! with no CHIRALITY!!!!!!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv I'll keep pointing out that ignorance of facts such as processes that affect handedness of life and that Miller's experiments were recently vindicated is not a valid argument.
TheScienceFoundation 7 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation Once again you are a MORON!! abiogenesis is chemically and mathematically impossible! and szostak creates NOTHING!! He borrows and rearranges pre existing INFORMATION to get his reactions going!!!!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Once again ignorance regarding the fact that his experiments have been vindicated in sulfur pools is not an argument.
TheScienceFoundation 7 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation It has NOTHING to do with origin of life! and abiogenesis! abiogenesis is IMPOSSIBLE!! Stanley Miller proved that almost 60 years ago!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv Of course he used material taken from other places, and of course it was an observational test.
Thus far your objections have been "He didn't created something from nothing and he did it in a controlled environment"
How do you think operational science is supposed to be done?
TheScienceFoundation 7 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation LOL..Ok szostak puts raw chemicals and molecules in test tubes and lets them self organize into protocells, all by undirected natural processes!
Szostak's starting materials and INFORMATION is always taken from other sources and he uses TEMPLATES!
Szostak has not successfully created any sort of self replicating living molecule from scratch!!!!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago
@5tonyvvvv I'm guess you haven't even attempted to read any of his work.
TheScienceFoundation 7 months ago
@TheScienceFoundation Szostak's "protocells" are not being created! Szostak's staring materials always consist of templates and INFORMATION taken from other living sources! Szostak is proving that it takes INTELLIGENCE to copy and borrow, and rearrange the blueprints GOD created in the first place!!!!
5tonyvvvv 7 months ago