Cambrian Explosion Destroys Evolution!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,329
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 22, 2007

Searching for Evolutionists Who will Defend Their Position (DEBATE DODGERS)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re6d-EvKkbA

Transitional Fossils? Evolutionists Say No!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=typrxYyiEEI .

"It is inherent in any definition of science that statements that cannot be checked by observation are not really saying anything--or at least they are not science." *George Gaylord Simpson, "The Nonprevalence of Humanoids," in Science 143 (1964) p. 770.

"We still do not know the mechanics of evolution in spite of the over-confident claims in some quarters, nor are we lightly to make further progress in this by the classical methods of paleontology or biology." Errol White, Proceedings of the Linnean Society, London 177:8 (1988)

"Fundamental truths about evolution have so far eluded us all, and that uncritical acceptance of Darwinism may be counterproductive as well as expedient. Far from ignoring or ridiculing the ground-swell of opposition to Darwinism that is growing, for example, in the United States, we should welcome it as an opprotunity to reexamine our sacred cow more closely." *B. Storehouse, "Introduction," in *Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution (1984), p. 12.

"How can one confidently assert that one mechanism rather than another was at the origin of the creation of the plans of [evolutionary] organization, if ones relies entirely upon the imagination to find a solution? Our ignorance is so great that we can not even assign with any accuracy an ancestral stock to the phyla Protozoa, Arthropoda, Mollusca and Vertebrata...From the almost total absence of fossil evidence relative to the origins of the phyla, it follows that an explanation of the mechanism in the creative evolution of the fundamental plans is heavily burdened with hypotheses. This should appear as an epigraph* to every book on evolution." *Pierre P. Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 178. [*epigraph - a quotation set at the beginning of a literary work.]

Mathematics, Probabilities and DNA
www.warneveryone.com/mathematics_probabilities_dna.htm
Spontaneous Generation
www.warneveryone.com/spontaneous_generation.htm
DNA and RNA
www.warneveryone.com/dna_rna.htm
Lucy
www.warneveryone.com/lucy.htm
Cows to Whales
www.warneveryone.com/whale.htm
Mutations
www.warneveryone.com/mutations.htm
Second Law of Thermodynamics
www.warneveryone.com/second_law.htm
Universe
www.warneveryone.com/universe.htm
Dino to Birds
www.warneveryone.com/dino_to_birds.htm
Appendix
www.warneveryone.com/appendix.htm
Fossils
www.warneveryone.com/fossils.htm
Vestigial Organs
www.warneveryone.com/vestigal_organs.htm
Neanderthal
www.warneveryone.com/neanderthal.htm
Giraffe
www.warneveryone.com/giraffe_long_neck.htm
Horse
www.warneveryone.com/horse.htm

Much more from The Evolution Handbook - http://www.evolution-facts.org/Handbook%20TOC.htm

"The extreme raity of transitional forms in the fossils record persists as the trade secret of paleontology, the evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils."
Stephen J. Gould, Natural History, Vol. 86, pgs 22,30 .

The Profusion of Living Fossils - http://www.icr.org/article/774 . An Australian Fossil Insect Bed Resulting from Cataclysmic Destruction - http://www.icr.org/article/474 .
It has been estimated, extrapolating from an average yield of 10-20 fossil insect wings per cubic foot, that there could be some hundreds of millions of fossil insect wings per square mile preserved in this bed.

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

The Institute for Creation Research equips believers with evidences of the Bible's accuracy and authority through scientific research, educational programs, and media presentations, all conducted within a thoroughly biblical framework.
info@icr.org
www.icr.org

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 139 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @BereanBeacon1 "We are very interested in real science, but you have nothing that you would dare to expose in a science format in a public debate. "

    The success of evolutionary biology, medicine, genetics, microbiology, etc., (and the national / international journals in which all of their findings are published for review) have repeatedly discredited your singularly unique and feebly manufactured interpretation of reality.

    Keep on cluckin'.

  • 11 Seconds before they lie. The Cambrian Period is when most PHYLA first showed up in the fossil record, NOT the first Complex Animals. There were no land animals, no reptiles, no birds, no mammals, Nothing but small marine creatures. There were ''complex'' animals in the Pre-Cambrian. Everyone had a mom and a dad just like today.

see all

All Comments (635)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Cambrian explosion is not an explosion of animals, but an explosion of fossils. The truth is that organisms had evolved early under conditions that did not favor fossilization, so that by the time organisms began to venture into areas that did favor fossilization, the progress of evolution was well established.

    Remember, the fossil record is not a literal translation of evolution. But rather snapshots in the time, 99% of evolution did not fossilize.

  • @foxhole8063 Again depends how you define it but I should of been clear, on the theory where you go from none life to life- That step is where it "starts". Anyhoo this is turning into pointless discusson. Check out this interestng debate instea dif u feel like it /watch?v=LgwqgSmIdHY

  • @Stianchez "... the same process accounts going from soup to fish and fish to land animal."

    How do inherited genetic variation and natural selection apply to non-living things?

  • @foxhole8063 I never quite got why people who support the theory always are so distinct in evolution and abiogenesis. It intuitely is the exact same thing, the same process accounts going from soup to fish and fish to land animal.

    Then again you have to define what you mean by diversity, there's diversity within humans but we are still just humans ;)

  • @Stianchez True, evolutionary theory explains the diversity of life, not the origin.  I think the problem with reading some of my comments to David is that they sometimes carry over from other threads ... that's an oversight on my part.

  • @foxhole8063 In short, as every scientists who works within the field of research excluded of how life orginiated. Does not care how life originated in regards to their work. Just the function ;) That was my whole claim. You seemed to assert somehow this supported the evolution theory in any way which it really has nothing to do with it.

  • @Stianchez Directed evolution is an application of the same exact principles, even if scientists are the ones who apply the selective pressures instead of nature.

    I'm not trying to take credit for anything ... I'm just showing how these fields (including evolutionary biology) are interconnected. Their continued demonstrated success (and advances) is validation of the existing theories, even if they still need improvement. I don't care if they were developed by Mormons or Rastafarians.

  • @foxhole8063 It was some random poll targetting the world view people idenfitied themselves to who worked on the development teams. Then again, majority is often wrong i was merely stating my point.

    The problem here is you try to take credit for something which just as easily applies to my side of the table.

    Directed evolution is just survival of the fittest(luckiest) although it is done in an enclosed area. It has nothing to do with the evolution theory in the sense we are discussing.

  • @evoTARDSareINSANE Hopefully not for much longer. =)

  • @Stianchez OK smartassed comments aside, look up "directed evolution", showing how it is applied to botany / agriculture, medicine, etc. As I said, these fields are interconnected.

    Not sure what your point is about this poll you read about, though.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more