Senator Chuck Hagel makes Sean Hannity MAD

Senator Chuck Hagel makes Sean Hannity MAD

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Senator
• Chuck
• Hagel
• makes
• Sean
• Hannity
• MAD

[snipet19]

Chuck Hagel made solid points, but Hannity didn't get mad at all (at least not compared to his other "flip out" clips), so change the title!

[lufo530]

I'm not going to debate with you about Osama and his links to Iraq which didn't exist. The CIA and every expert out there says you're wrong. You keep living in a dream world if you want. But keep it to yourself. The "terror," that Iraq was engaged in was state sponsored, not the same sort as Osama. There are plenty of state sponsors of terror that are way more dangerous than Saddam. All you do is tune into fox and make your mind narrower and narrower, your kind is on the decline though. ThankGod

[lufo530]

Tell me, how is learning together arrogant? I never EVER said anything about my education. YOU'RE the one who accused me of calling you "stupid," which i never did, and pinned me with the label "scholar," which I never once brought up. You're CLEARLY self conscious about your lack of knowledge surrounding the most elementary aspects of all these issues. Thats why you keep changing the topic of our debate. Because you want to be "right" about something, anything. The only way for that is to learn

[lutheratx]

This arrogant fella just told me in my private email "You want to ask me questions or learn with me, fine." He can't tell I don't agree with him, why would I seek his counsel? The guy is also rude. I will let this apparent highly, educate scholar have the last word, because I can't stand when people are like this.

[lutheratx]

"However, the (9/11) commission also found that bin Laden did "explore possible cooperation with Iraq." Google word for word except what is in parenthesis. "The Iraqi regime was involved in regional and international terrorist operations prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom. The predominant targets of Iraqi state terror operations were Iraqi citizens, both inside and outside of Iraq" this is the info. I tried to direct you too.I am no scholar its just a few others and myself see justification 4 Iraq

[lufo530]

Think about this with the facts aside, since you never look at facts anyways! Just think of it logically. Why would Saddam Hussien, the greedy military dictator of a country, hire people to punish people when he controls the whole country? GET THIS THROUGH YOUR HEAD. 1)THERE WERE NO WMD'S 2.)THERE WAS NO ALQAEDA THERE UNIL AFTER WE INVADED 3.)BUSH DID NOT WORK WITH THE UN 4)WE HAVE NOT DEFEATED AL-QAEDA IN IRAQ 5)SADDAM DID NOT HAVE A TENDENCY TO WORK WITH TERRORISTS 6)YOU NEED TO STUDY HISTORY

[lufo530]

When i said saddam and osama i was refering to their regimes. I'm lying? So what I said never happened? You know, the claims you are making simply go against history. I'm done lookin at what you tell me to google and look at. I've gone to three of you sources and THEY ALL GO AGAINST WHAT YOU SAY! You're the one who needs to read the history of the region. Start from WWI. A Good book is called The Modern Middle East by William Cleveland.

[lutheratx]

I never said Osama and Saddam talked,but you are lying about how Saddam funded terror.Google"Pentagon Iraq Al Qaeda" He used hired guns to punish Iraqis in and out of Iraq.You have to consider why we didn't want Al Qaeda to work with Iraq.We didn't want a dirty bomb detonated here,Osama may have dealt with Saddam for those types of weapons,and Saddam has a tendency to work with terrorgroups.Bush acted because the UNinspectors were held up long enough to hide WMD's&we fought Al qaeda in Iraq too

[lufo530]

You are not above water. The justification of war was that they WERE working together not that they spoke. Do you know the source of the information on the "talks," between Saddam and Osama? It was ONE guy who was a cab driver in Iraq, and later he came out and admitted he lied! Finally you dont know history very well huh? Saddam was a dictator who wanted no rivals that's why he kicked terrorists out of Iraq and kept them out. It does look good for my argument. I've bothered to study the history

[lufo530]

1.)Analyze more information doesn't prove anything you're saying. The "support of terrorists," Saddam gave? He gave money to the widows of suicide bombers since they were mostly men, the bread winners of the now fatherless house hold. Is that cause for the USA to invade and spend 400 Million/day?

2)If al-qaeda is out of Iraq who is killing our troops?

3Youve changed the amount from your previous one, second the CIA said there were no wmds, and we sold that to him. Was that after this invasion?