Kent Hovind gets owned on his radio show!Part 1 of 3

Kent Hovind gets owned by a future scientist that calls into his radio show.Kent is so pathetic that you almost feel sorry for him.....almost:)
produced by EGarrett01

http://youtube.com/user/EGarrett01

This video was pulled on 9/10/07 due to a fraudulent DMCA claim by the evil CSE! NOW IT HAS RETURNED! Fuck Kent Hovind and the CSE!


part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXgl4AUZnrg

part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8bHEWQOsiU




This is martins blog
http://lancelet.blogspot.com/

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• hovind
• eddygoombah
• rado
• show
• creationism
• atheism
• free
• thought
• express
• religion
• evolution
• bible
• cse
• science

[Casshyr]

@fix4111000 human mind is easily subjected to supernatural delusions. If you travel back to Ancient Greece, everybody around you would claim Hades is real, and backed it up by personal testimonies, archaeological evidence, holy scriptures...etc. There can't be a Hates without there being a Zeus.

[fix4111000]

And its no surprise to me that kent hovind is locked up this is what has happened to all of the people that tell the truth thats getting old now the gig is up people.

[fix4111000]

This martin guy is not owning anybody. He's scrambling around the facts period and simply sounds like someone who refuses to believe that Yahweh is king of this universe. He needs to look around and notice that there are many many many people who worship satan meaning if satan is a entity of this earth then Yahweh is the ruler of all things. There can't be a satan without there being a Jesus.

[Casshyr]

@ProMajtas lmao so your logic is "wow, look how finely tuned the universe is...if it is any bit off, we will all die. that's proof of God design!". That's totally false. If that's your argument, then better luck next time.

[virgilxoxo1]

hell ya!

[ProMajtas]

@Casshyr wow so it looks like I have to explain it to you like you're 3. ok tide is movement of bodies of water happens twice a day if this tide was to cover the whole planet every land animal would die. if the moon was to be 1/3 of the distance to the earth the gravitational pull would have 9 times the strength it has today according to the inverse square law. I have no idea how to explain this to you better, relay my brother is 6 and he understands this.

[Casshyr]

@ProMajtas "Seems pretty clear to me" => "if two big objects like the earth and the moon would be close than the gravitational pull would greater than if they would be farther away" ....what are you trying to say? Just rephrase it. It has nothing to do with attack on faith. It's about the clarity. I don't even understand it to know what to attack.

[ProMajtas]

@Casshyr I don't know if you noticed but this argument is not about grammar. Tell me what is wrong about my sentence. Seems pretty clear to me. Tell me how you attacked my faith in this sentence?

[Casshyr]

@ProMajtas "when there is an organ that is 100% useless than it's ok to call it vestigial." => 2 things. You miss out the part about comparing to original functions, and also, it doesn't have to be 100% loss for an organ to be vestigial. Seriously, this is like grade 10 science....are you out of high school yet?

[Casshyr]

@ProMajtas "if two big objects like the earth and the moon would be close than the gravitational pull would greater than if they would be farther away" => can't understand, too many grammatical errors and awkward sentence structures. I know you are frustrated cuz your precious faith is under attack and you are having a hard time providing evidence lol, but plz remain coherent.