Ad Targets LDS Church, Gay Marriage Issue

William Tyndale was burned alive in the 16th century for printing the English Bible. This was the "tolerance" for religion in England that pushed boatload after boatload of Englishman to the eastern seaboard of the United States, seeking freedom.

Thomas JeffersonJefferson swore eternal hostility toward any form of tyranny upon the mind of man: "I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man."

Religious Liberty was of the highest order and concern to these colonists, and the very first of their spelled out "Bill of Rights" reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

So, the First Amendment was to keep the damned hand of government tyranny off of religion, for "Congress shall make no law" concerning religion, and neither shall the damned Soviet Courts in the United States today. Prop 8 was not an "anti-gay" measure, but a 1st Amendment measure to protect religion from the wicked courts who are hostile and seek an inroad at slaughtering the First Amendment. Judges the ilk of Governor Lilburn W. Boggs of Missouri with his infamous "extermination order" against the Mormon's are ready and anxious to criminalize religion if they can do so.

An example of these most wicked courts. Recently, the Soviet US District Court in San Francisco ruled that "parental rights are severed" when a child crosses the threshold of the school. Where did this Stalin/Mao/Hitlarian ruling come from? Straight from a tyrannical hell, a US Court that is as un-American as anything you hear of today. People 30 years ago would have laughed you to scorn if you would have predicted a court ruling could take place in America that followed the Marxist ideology of the USSR. But, here we are. Such Soviet rulings have been made and will continue to be made. That ruling enforced a plank of the Communist Manifesto.

Respecting religion and the "free exercise thereof," churches absolutely must defend against these damned, wicked courts who now "make law" which the 1st Amendment prohibits Congress from doing, regarding religion.

I hope, in a nutshell, this explains the real issue. What a damned lie to say this is "hate filled" by churches. Churches did not start this battle, but they shall be destroyed if they don't stand up and defend the 1st Amendment. It is their defense against hate filled judges who will begin criminalizing churches as soon as they can get an inroad to do so. Marriage as defined as a "man and a woman" is a buffer against such tyranny upon the 1st Amendment. Gay people can have every right and do so under the law. The only difference is their "domestic unions" are not given the legal definition to be a "marriage" which protects churches from a ruthless tyrannical government hell bent upon legislating it into oblivion by the Secularist High Priests of the State Religion of Secularism---the Judges.

Mormon's, more than any other people on earth today, perhaps, ought to know what governments can do, for in the 19th Century, the US Federal government sought to "destroy the LDS Church as an institution" as Gordon B. Hinckley expressed a while back. It is true, murder of leadership, their imprisonment, lootings, rape, robbings, plunder, seizure of assets, burning of temples, shutting down of temples, "extermination orders," it's all been had before, and is prophesied to transpire again. We're fools to let it come about easily by not seeking to ensure the 1st Amendment is of force, keeping judges damned hands from "making law" against religion and "the free exercise thereof." Thus, those crying that this is an unfair fight at "denying rights" from gay couples are liars, and the best line sophistry sold in the 2008 election year.

http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/lds_targeted.htm

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• gay
• mormon
• temple
• homosexual
• rights
• marriage
• prop
• california
• voters
• constitution
• amendment
• first
• speech
• freedom
• religi

[davidls11]

Shame on the mormon church. They should lose their tax exempt status.

[yellowkrux]

Marriage between a man & women of the same race, was once cherished by our ancestors , it doesn't change the fact that it was wrong not to allow people to marry people of other races & it's wrong not to allow guy people to marry as well. & no one is trying to silence the church there just trying to shame them.

[padude64]

I will ebate southern confederates who supprt Newt and if you were that religious you would not support his 3 marriages so dont go there!

[padude64]

Hate is the presursor STD because you arents hate your kid becaus ehe is gay and your child goes out and finds someone who he or she likes and that person is of the same sex! Are you kidding me?

[padude64]

@jbrabec22 Prove marriage is between a man and a woman you moron?

[padude64]

Bigots are why STD's are prevalent because these minorities were not allowed to live their lives in a peaceful way! Republican evangelicals are allowed to hate in their way but gay people need a true outlet! I want one evangelical to debate and yes I will make it political because I will make mince meat out of Rick Santorum!

[jbrabec22]

Amazing how people try and silence the free speech of religious people. Marriage defined as a man / woman relationship has been cherished by our ancestors - no, we will not be silenced. Mormons were thrown in jail at one time when they practiced polygamy, so they have earned the right to protect what your fathers hold dear!

[heathdwatts]

It's time to tax churches. They have tremendous political power, preach from their pulpits and run hate campaigns. They should pay taxes. I'm tired of giving religious nuts a free ride.

[whitney4e]

"the church did not contribute, they only urged.." uh, hello~ are you stupid?

so basically the church is responsible because they "urged" its followers to "act" certain ways.

[Darkbison7]

If atheists are able to get legal marriage without any church's approval...and sterile heterosexuals are able to get legal marriage without the ability to procreate...and single mothers can legally keep their children without marrying 'just to have both male and female genitalia in the household'...then there is no valid incentive to legally ban SSM.

Tell me if a Jewish majority would be able to ban pork in the USA to 'protect their religion'...

[anti0stupid0people]

source? Names? times? this, as of now, is simply a claim, not fact.