Ann Coulter Calls MSNBC Host Cenk Uygur 'Retarded'

Cenk Uygur (host of The Young Turks, MSNBC contributor) lifts his 'ban' on discussing Ann Coulter after she personally attacks him on Twitter because of his MSNBC interview of gay Republican Chris Barron (GOProud spokesman).

http://www.businessinsider.com/will-sarah-palin-call-for-ann-coulters-head-ov...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/06/ann-coulter-retarded-msnbc_n_805135....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cenk-uygur/ann-coulter-vs-sarah-pali_b_805193.html

I recently interviewed Chris Barron of GOProud, a gay conservative organization that believes that the Republican Party is welcoming of gay Americans. The issue was that some prominent conservative organizations were boycotting the largest conservative conference in the country because they allowed GOProud to attend. Seems very welcoming.

The interview was heated (you can see it here). I think it is absurd to vote Republican if you're gay. The party ran their whole campaign against gay Americans in 2004 and 2006 -- and bragged about it. The GOP just overwhelmingly voted against repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell. And there are only a million other examples of how Republicans are against every gay rights issue. Of course a gay person can be conservative on economic issues or on foreign policy, but to say you're going to vote for a party that hates you is beyond irrational.

Well, apparently Ann Coulter doesn't agree. She watched the interview, then tweeted: http://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/20731025923506176

Great video: head of GOProud interviewed by retarded person on MSNBC - http://bit.ly/h1mvwq

Though I'm flattered that Ann thought it was a great video, there seems to be another issue here. Coulter called me a "retarded person." Now, I am not the least bit bothered by that. In fact, I am greatly amused at Coulter challenging anyone else's intelligence or cognitive abilities. But I do know someone who should be steaming mad about this -- Sarah Palin.

I thought Sarah Palin had banned the R-word. Palin called for Rahm Emaunel to be fired when he used that word and added:

Just as we'd be appalled if any public figure of Rahm's stature ever used the "N-word" or other such inappropriate language, Rahm's slur on all God's children with cognitive and developmental disabilities -- and the people who love them -- is unacceptable, and it's heartbreaking.

Does that mean Sarah Palin also thinks Ann Coulter should be fired? Does Ann Coulter have a job she can be fired from? What does Ann Coulter do with her life? Come to think of it, what does Sarah Palin do? More importantly, how will these ladies settle this?

Does Sarah Palin think that the word is less "unacceptable" or "heartbreaking" when a Republican uses it? Or is she just as outraged by Coulter as she was by Emanuel? I mean, Sarah Palin wouldn't be enough of hypocrite to attack a Democrat over the word but not a Republican, right? I look forward to her response.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ann
• coulter
• ban
• glenn
• beck
• fox
• news
• sarah
• palin
• right
• wing
• crazy
• conservative
• republican
• msnbc
• retarded
• chris
• barron
• chairman
• goproud
• gay
• tweet
• twitter
• attack
• closet
• log
• cabin
• karl
• rove
• george
• bush
• homosexual
• interview
• don't
• ask
• tell
• dadt
• repeal
• congress
• votes
• campaign
• elections
• religious
• hate
• cpac
• homophobia
• boycott
• liberals
• filibuster
• intolerant
• marriage
• equality
• civil
• unions
• rights
• sin
• morals
• politics
• tyt
• young
• turks
• cenk
• uygur

[MrSteveykk]

I totally agree with Cenk on this one. You have to be one hell of a sellout to side with people who are against your very existence.

[slackologist]

Ann is a nut-case, her brain is seriously messed up. Either that or she is just plain evil. Whatever her problem is, she doesn't deserve to be given any credibility whatsoever.

[lou123654]

being called retarded by ann Coulter is a great compliment.

You should treasure her kindness :)

[Ramirez8804]

@ffairlane57 I'll answer any of your questions. I appreciate your post.

And yes I might just be Batman!

[ffairlane57]

@Ramirez8804 , I don't get your argument. Some of it doesn't make any sense.

[Ramirez8804]

@rnalithe00 If you want evidence, tell a liberal that you don't feel discriminated against and you do not support gay marriage.

See what happens. Then do it again and again until you see that they want you, and me, and every gay individual to stay in the mold they designed for us. Any attempts to think things not sanctioned by the Left and we cease to be relevent to the liberal who only moments before claimed to love us.

Try it. Don't get mad at me. I didn't do anything.

[rnalithe00]

@Ramirez8804 Yeah, keep saying it, and maybe it will all of a sudden be true. Don't bother explaining anything or provide evidence, ever. Gay or not, I can see you'd fit in well with the republicans.

[Ramirez8804]

@rnalithe00 Well they aren't. Falsehood has a certain scent to it just as Truth does.

No...you proved my point well.

[rnalithe00]

@Ramirez8804 What the hell are you talking about? I didn't even know you were gay. And you don't know that I'm a liberal. So I didn't prove your point whatsoever.

You're also not even questioning liberalism. You simply assert that they are not honest.

[Ramirez8804]

@tiredofboolsheeit Don't wish such things on anyone. For your own sake. He is one of the dumbest people I have ever seen on TV. Easily. Don't beocme him though my friend. And no matter who the nominee is vote for him so we can end this chapter of the liberal nightmare.

Have a nice night.

[Ramirez8804]

@rnalithe00 Well...you're liberal. I am gay. I am questioning liberalism. And so right away you mock me and try to cast me to irelevancy.

It is exactly as I described in my first post.

[rnalithe00]

@Ramirez8804 And how did I do that?