all you simple minded naysayers

I apologize if my viewers think I have blew a fuse. I am just sick and tired of these no data try to quote farady try to prove hho wrong with horsepower.

Look up torque
look up horsepower

Torque is what moves a vehicle. Diesels are more eff both thermodynamically and in mpg due to higher compression which yeilds higher cylinder pressure.


Increase cylinder pressure = more mpg

increased cylinder pressure at low rpm = more mpg

increase flame speed increases cylinder pressure = more mpg

shorter burn time means less heat transfer means more mechanical power= more mpg


These are the "laws of physics" for an ICE engine. Read it research it understand it.

Why do diesels do more work with a lower kw rating than gasoline?

Why not make gas act more like diesel? Thats what hydroxy does. Just wait till you see mt super high compression gas engine run on 87 octane with hydroxy. I will let that video of dyno tests tell the tale.

Ever woner why a peterbuilt can move 80k pounds with only 30 kw of power. a new toyota pick up has more than that. you cant get a toyota to pull that trailer. especially at 10 mpg. the peterbuilt makes in excess of 1500ftlbs of torque thats why.

kw ratings are for electric motors and have very little relevance in the real world of automotives.

kw rating is a calculated measurement nothing more. The torque is what moves mountains, not hp.without torque a vehicle is useless.


research comprehend visualize understand. ITs so simple its scary. Now we just have to figure it out engine design by engine design.

I thank all the viewers of hho for your support. But be warned most claims are scams or copys of others scams. Application is not easy the theory and concept is

God bless

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• hho
• diesel
• watts
• kw
• naysayers

[turbomoore]

Data? Watch this video: /watch?v=PFrkHFmjx0c. It took 65Amps to get a 2HP engine to just IDLE. If the resistance across the generator is only 1single ohm (it has to be WAY HIGHER than that) it would consume 4.2kW of power, this is almost 6HP. You WILL have to have a 6HP engine to turn a generator at 4.2kW. 4.2kW of power doesn't care what kind of torque or compression ratio you use to get it. "Faraday" applies directly here, and torque (and your description of it with HP) is very irrelivant.

[higherpoweredh2o]

I dont know why everyone goes straight to over unity, or self running . I am talking mixing fuels. And hp and torque was quite relevant. Different flash points and burn rates have different hp and torque in a given engine. Thats why your f150 with the gasifier has less power than gas. less overall btu slower burn ect. To get more out of producer gas higher compression is needed.

[triden55]

3.0 liters per minute of HHO only provides 4.1 TENTHS OF ONE PERCENT of the energy requirement of a 24.1 MPG vehicle at 60 MPH....I doubt your cell is anymore useful

[derikk123]

Hey dude how many liters of oxyhydrogen would it take to run my little 1 liter engine? So far ive gotten 63 mpgs and i want to increase it.

[gabet123]

Google HHOINFO join us.

[jkk20]

@higherpoweredh2o: since pressure is the force that push the piston down and make the crank do its thing etc... do you think that creating a piston with a shape that would allow the shockwave created by the explosion to push down a certain portion of said piston creating a secondary higher pressure wave ???? ive seen some old footage of nuclear testing on youtube where they explained a phenomenon just like that .... then we wouldnt need hho to increase % efficiency of gasoline engine ....

[HomeDistiller]

again a BTU is an instantaneous measurement not an amount of work, HHO may increase burn speed and make it slightly more efficient but it CAN NOT increase the amount of energy available. if you have 5 Kg of charcoal and 1kg of charcoal, then burnt them both over an hour (only goes boom the other slowly) the same amount of energy would be released. the only way HHO will increase power etc is by injecting more fuel or reving higher (there by increasing

fuel use) flame speed wont increase rpm

[HomeDistiller]

torque is instantaneous power. the amount of power right now. and kW/HP is torque over time whats known as WORK, lots of torque means lots of gears and undriveabilty. i am yet to see a dyno report, or a peer reviewed science paper that proves there is a net gain from adding a HHO cell. BTW you are doing exactly the same thing you are complaining about. you want to prove it works then go to a collage and convince someone to publish a paper.

[gauchejim]

Its good to see dialog on this issue. I have just heard about it and the physics that I understand tell me it doesn't work. But if you know better don't enter ito some diatribe The scientific process is clearits not for the skeptic to disprove it is for the claimant to prove it. So prove it. Contract an independent college or university to do a torque power and specific fuel consumption test.That is all the proof you will need and you will shut up all those skeptics. I DARE YOU.

[Atimar01]

@ke4uyp

1 liter water breakes down into 1800 liter HHO

plz try to calculate things in only liters, or only in whatever you want, but don't compare different measures of capacity since its confusing for every1 including yourself

[Atimar01]

finally some1 who knows how hho works :)

some "impossible" sayers calculate why it won't work cuz of btu's

they should for once calculate the btu's in charcoal and than in TNT

as far as i know, TNT has only 1/5th of the btu's that charcoal has

light 1 kg of charcoal, hous gets nice and warm ...

light 1 kg of TNT, and its bye bye house

difference is in flame speed

charcoal burns slow, TNT fast (explodes)

same goes for HHO, burns fast but enhances gasoline for faster burn b4 powerstroke

[ke4uyp]

Lets say that the Kong 80 Plate Electrolyzer can produce 1200 Liters per Hour of HHO using only 32oz of water. This would mean that it is producing 37.5 Liters of HHO from 1oz of water.