@IpMan19 The reason you make this "statement is because you did NOT put on your "Passive 3D Polarizing Glasses on" in Front of Any 3D HDTVs or 3D Computer LCD or LED Monitors"!!!
I have a severe problem with every companies price range with this tech in the US... I'm not going to buy a shutter type 3D tv nor polarized nor autostereoscopic until the prices reflect the almost non-existent R&D that went into making the system. These systems should not be this expensive... Period.
@IpMan19 The reason you make this "statement is because you did NOT put on your "Passive 3D Polarizing Glasses on" in Front of Any 3D HDTVs or 3D Computer LCD or LED Monitors"!!!
Jules7892 5 months ago
@starspace
the picture quality is shit
IpMan19 6 months ago
beacause better picture quality needs more space :-)
starspace 6 months ago
Realmente a sensação de realidade e muito grande.
dinotiago 10 months ago
I have a severe problem with every companies price range with this tech in the US... I'm not going to buy a shutter type 3D tv nor polarized nor autostereoscopic until the prices reflect the almost non-existent R&D that went into making the system. These systems should not be this expensive... Period.
percheron1654 1 year ago
philips made these tv's wich u dont have to use the glasses to xperience 3d, only available in europe
mitsuevo8mr 1 year ago
I LIKE PHILIPS IS THE BEST TV's
Mfuao 1 year ago 2
yes as with all 3D TVs 3D is not a new thing it's a con to get you to buy a new tv after just buying the one you have now
acctim100 1 year ago
@IpMan19 lol idk but thats your opinion. i would trade space for truer contrast and color xD
itom95 1 year ago
@itom95
Stupid design then, lol!!
IpMan19 1 year ago