What does variety teach us about God? Find out in this video from Creation Moments. Then go to creationmoments.com to listen to over 1,000 audio messages that support creation and refute evolution.
Honestly, someone who doesn't believe in God b/c of evolution doesn't know anything about the theory of evolution. People will look for any reason not to accept Christ. Stick with the Bible, Using your lack of understanding about evolution will only damage the cause to save souls. Hmmm... which has the power to break the bondage of sin.... one of man's current scientific viewpoints... dont think so. Good luck
Sorry, I don't spend much time on utube, but how is it that humans are not classified as primates? What scientific books have u been reading? By saying humans are not primates, you have pretty much lost any credibility. Spiritually we have a soul, and have the opportunity to have a personal relationship with God. Trying to disprove evoluiton will only make you look like a lunatic, and give ammo to nonbelievers to portray christians as lunatics as well.
'Humans, chimps, and the rest of us tailless primates'....excuse me but humans are not primates!! I can not prove the existence of God to you because he is spirit and you have to know him spiritually - you apparently don't know Him that way. You are correct that God is not tentative -He never changes.
'Kind' is not so broad that it cannot be used to identify between animal 'kind' or plant 'kind'. Read the definition above to help you understand it better. ;-)
You need to be careful with that arguement b/c if you make you definition of kind too broad, this is the problem: Humans, chimps, and the rest of us tailless primates should be considered a kind (after all we are all apes). I think going beyond the bible (even if you think you are right) to prove the existence of God is full of pit falls (with your arguement you just fell in one). Stick to the bible. Science is tenative which is a good thing. God isn't.
No, it's not like a reptile to mammal!! Good grief - it is still bacteria! ;-) Genes may have 'shifted' but it is no different than having green eyes or blue. They are still eyes.
Ah, so now we go back to "kinds", a phrase that has no definition and no visible limit. It is just put wherever Creationists need a quick fix. It IS still a bacteria, you are correct. But it is only similar to it's predecessor in it's phylum, a very broad taxonomic classification. Most of it's genetic code has been shifted however, so while it still creates a bacterium, it is extremely different. Bacterium to bacterium in this case is like reptile to mammal.
There seems to be a special mechanism that recombines parts of the genes in the plasmids in a way that is non-random. This is shown by the absence of stop codons, which would be generated if the variation were random. So you see, it is still a bacteria, always was, always will be.
How about Nylon-eating bacteria of the Flavobacterium strain?
It's not just a small change in the genome within this organism, but an entire shift in base pairs throughout most of the organism. It is an amazing organism, much different from it's known ancestors.
You still haven't given me an example of evolution that has been documented.
Oh, I do look at scientific evidence, however, I see how it just keeps proving Scripture. You realize that creation scientists and evolution scientists view the same evidence.
what does the suffering in the world teach us about god.
sMASHsound 1 year ago
Honestly, someone who doesn't believe in God b/c of evolution doesn't know anything about the theory of evolution. People will look for any reason not to accept Christ. Stick with the Bible, Using your lack of understanding about evolution will only damage the cause to save souls. Hmmm... which has the power to break the bondage of sin.... one of man's current scientific viewpoints... dont think so. Good luck
fresnodarwindog 2 years ago
Sorry, I don't spend much time on utube, but how is it that humans are not classified as primates? What scientific books have u been reading? By saying humans are not primates, you have pretty much lost any credibility. Spiritually we have a soul, and have the opportunity to have a personal relationship with God. Trying to disprove evoluiton will only make you look like a lunatic, and give ammo to nonbelievers to portray christians as lunatics as well.
fresnodarwindog 2 years ago
'Humans, chimps, and the rest of us tailless primates'....excuse me but humans are not primates!! I can not prove the existence of God to you because he is spirit and you have to know him spiritually - you apparently don't know Him that way. You are correct that God is not tentative -He never changes.
'Kind' is not so broad that it cannot be used to identify between animal 'kind' or plant 'kind'. Read the definition above to help you understand it better. ;-)
heidilisbeth 2 years ago
You need to be careful with that arguement b/c if you make you definition of kind too broad, this is the problem: Humans, chimps, and the rest of us tailless primates should be considered a kind (after all we are all apes). I think going beyond the bible (even if you think you are right) to prove the existence of God is full of pit falls (with your arguement you just fell in one). Stick to the bible. Science is tenative which is a good thing. God isn't.
fresnodarwindog 2 years ago
No, it's not like a reptile to mammal!! Good grief - it is still bacteria! ;-) Genes may have 'shifted' but it is no different than having green eyes or blue. They are still eyes.
heidilisbeth 2 years ago
Ah, so now we go back to "kinds", a phrase that has no definition and no visible limit. It is just put wherever Creationists need a quick fix. It IS still a bacteria, you are correct. But it is only similar to it's predecessor in it's phylum, a very broad taxonomic classification. Most of it's genetic code has been shifted however, so while it still creates a bacterium, it is extremely different. Bacterium to bacterium in this case is like reptile to mammal.
BrellK 2 years ago
There seems to be a special mechanism that recombines parts of the genes in the plasmids in a way that is non-random. This is shown by the absence of stop codons, which would be generated if the variation were random. So you see, it is still a bacteria, always was, always will be.
heidilisbeth 2 years ago
How about Nylon-eating bacteria of the Flavobacterium strain?
It's not just a small change in the genome within this organism, but an entire shift in base pairs throughout most of the organism. It is an amazing organism, much different from it's known ancestors.
BrellK 2 years ago
You still haven't given me an example of evolution that has been documented.
Oh, I do look at scientific evidence, however, I see how it just keeps proving Scripture. You realize that creation scientists and evolution scientists view the same evidence.
heidilisbeth 2 years ago