2009 Stanley Cup Finals Game 2: Detroit Red Wings vs. Pittsburgh Penguins: Abdelkader goal
Loading...
7,844
Uploader Comments (MikosWpg)
Top Comments
-
Nice goal by the Michigan native.
-
I like how the commenter calls Fleury Osgood.
see all
All Comments (24)
-
He was pretty impressive those two games.
-
any1 know what was the song at the start of the game like in the introduction?
-
Good product of Michigan State.
-
I hate the Wings, Buffalo fan.
-
I don't know the original message your responding too, but if you think about it, in some situations, that's the best choice.
-
thats the stupidest thing I've ever heard. You realize the puck has to fully cross the crease, and Crosby's didn't even spill into the crease. That was definitely a goal, dude.
-
The stupid, it burns.
-
I'd suggest that it would appear you both support the Wings. So let's just get along.
Loading...
LOL watch 0:34 it hits off the top of the goal and never goes in LOL. Sorry but at least it looks that way LOL. and in that game the one Crosby shot that they said "wasn't a goal" was a goal and this that wasn't a goal they call a goal.
jac53271 2 years ago
I'm not sure I see it the same way.
The Crosby shot wasn't a goal. Could have resulted in a penalty shot due to Zetterberg closing his glove on the puck in the crease but the puck never crossed the line.
As to Abdelkader's goal, I'm pretty sure it went in.
MikosWpg 2 years ago
it couldn't be a penalty shot, he didn't cover it, he just blocked it, thats legal. I agree otherwise
1was2was3was 2 years ago
I'm with you.
I was just suggesting that had Zetterberg closed his hand on the puck then perhaps they could have called a penalty. (although I see I wrote 'closing his hand') so to clarify I meant could have been called a penalty not that it was had he closed his hand on the puck in the crease.
MikosWpg 2 years ago