"Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us"

http://rsc.jordan.house.gov/
Amidst the turmoil of the 111th Congress, which included such egregious legislation as Cap-and-Trade and ObamaCare, the Republican Study Committee created this video to illustrate how Washington has strayed from the ideas that made our nation great. Freedom and prosperity do not spring from government's power to tax, borrow, and spend. Instead we must get Washington out of the way and allow private enterprise to thrive.

Follow the RSC on Twitter: @RepublicanStudy

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Republican
• Study
• Committee
• Democrats
• Democratic
• Party
• Barack
• Obama
• President
• Nancy
• Pelosi
• Ronald
• Reagan
• Time
• for
• Choosing
• Speech
• nancy
• pelosi
• pass
• the
• bill
• to
• see
• what
• is
• in
• it
• pubic
• option
• health
• care
• reform
• passed
• john
• dingell
• put
• legislation
• place
• control
• people
• at
• certain
• point
• you
• have
• made
• enough
• money
• joe
• biden
• spend
• keep
• from
• going
• bankrupt
• reagan
• vs
• democrats
• obama
• unemployment
• debt
• economy
• taxes
• america
• president
• government
• liberal
• conservative
• party
• politics
• jim jordan

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser Thus, once again. You failed. Try again.

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser No it wasn't rhetorical. You clearly do not know what a rhetorical question is. I was asking if you could repost the post that is not showing up on my screen again. And we've established that all of your arguments to date are logically contradictory. They did not beg because if they lied or are hypocrites as you stated, then they weren't sincere contrary to your definition of "beg." And I told you that I never acknowledged they did lie so asking me when is assuming they did.

[sgtisaloser]

@NRAdude More rhetorical questions from you? Not even 'interesting' anymore.

We've established that the republicons who:

-voted NO on the stimulus because they claimed it wouldn't create jobs, but then;

-begged for the money saying that the money WOULD create jobs;

must have lied at some point: either when they said the stimulus wouldn't create jobs, or when they said it would.

As I asked you before: When did they lie? When they said it wouldn't create jobs or when they said it would? Y or N

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser You there?

[sgtisaloser]

@NRAdude Uh, my statements are right there. Go a few statements down.

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser Did you respond to my last comment or no? If you did I'm not seeing it.

[marionetemanJ]

@sgtisaloser Do you know that Christianity is correct? The world around us reveals that G-d DOES exist, and the historical evidence reveals that Jesus Christ really did come to this earth and there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus Christ really did physically rise from the dead. Jesus is coming again and the signs of the end times that were foretold in the Bible are coming to pass.

[sgtisaloser]

@NRAdude Additionally, since 'logic', how YOU use it (persuasive written or verbal debate) can ONLY be a human issue (no other animal, nor inanimate objects, engage in persuasive debate in verbal or written form), then per YOUR STATEMENT months ago, it must be fallible. All things associated with it must be fallible, including the 'logical fallacies' you like to employ.

Can you show that inanimate objects or other animals engage in persuasive written or verbal debates?

"Yes" or "No"?

[sgtisaloser]

What did you give a response to? Beyond asking other questions?

- When did the republicans who asked for stimulus money after voting no lie...when they said the stimulus would not create jobs, or after they voted no and begged for the money stating it WOULD create jobs?

If you don't know, just say so.

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser I gave a response that you didn't respond to so I was just checking to see if you meant to respond and forgot or it just got garbled by youtube. How is stating that I didn't understand something you said a diversion?