"Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us"

http://rsc.jordan.house.gov/
Amidst the turmoil of the 111th Congress, which included such egregious legislation as Cap-and-Trade and ObamaCare, the Republican Study Committee created this video to illustrate how Washington has strayed from the ideas that made our nation great. Freedom and prosperity do not spring from government's power to tax, borrow, and spend. Instead we must get Washington out of the way and allow private enterprise to thrive.

Follow the RSC on Twitter: @RepublicanStudy

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Republican
• Study
• Committee
• Democrats
• Democratic
• Party
• Barack
• Obama
• President
• Nancy
• Pelosi
• Ronald
• Reagan
• Time
• for
• Choosing
• Speech
• nancy
• pelosi
• pass
• the
• bill
• to
• see
• what
• is
• in
• it
• pubic
• option
• health
• care
• reform
• passed
• john
• dingell
• put
• legislation
• place
• control
• people
• at
• certain
• point
• you
• have
• made
• enough
• money
• joe
• biden
• spend
• keep
• from
• going
• bankrupt
• reagan
• vs
• democrats
• obama
• unemployment
• debt
• economy
• taxes
• america
• president
• government
• liberal
• conservative
• party
• politics
• jim jordan

[Athruebelief]

@goatface1000 ProPecia was in the news. Seems she's been stealing Tide detergent to make ends meet.

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser You can't seem to come to grips that everything you try and argue is fallible can you?

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser And again, you're trying to make an argument that is thus fallible. Where did I ever say I was fallible or "recognized that I was fallible?" Logical Fallacy of the Straw Man. My source is logic which is infallible unless you want to say that gravity and the laws of mathematics and physics are fallible. Try again.

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser That's funny given your continued use of logical fallacies and contradictions. I only need to repeat it since you keep trying to make arguments. Thus if you keep trying to make arguments to "prove" anything then I'll cal you out on it.

[NRAdude]

@sgtisaloser And I'll keep repeating the fact that you cannot prove anything since you claimed that "arguments are fallible." Thus you either lied when you said you "proved" anything or you just came to that conclusion. The contradiction is in the fact that your argument that "arguments are fallible" assumes that it is itself necessarily true (thus being infallible) when it claims that no argument is infallible. Therefore, contradiction. Thus your argument is contradictory meaning wrong. Next

[ProPatriaBloodHonour]

@goatface1000

Dance circus bear. Dance.

[sgtisaloser]

@goatface1000 I believe he does, but he's trapped himself so often, he now seemingly has to pretend that he doesn't see the full statement.

This is why he feels a need to say the same thing three times in only slightly different ways. Funny.

[sgtisaloser]

@NRAdude Wow, you repeated yourself three times in a row, as if that means something. Cute. I'll respond in kind:

"You're arguing and you said arguments were fallible. Thus you again contradict yourself. "

Where is the contradiction? Arguments are fallible. Fallible still means 'capable of being wrong' not 'auto wrong'.

Now, unless you're saying you're 'infallible', then you recognize that you and your sources are 'fallible'.

Thus, it still gets down to who is 'less fallible'.

[NRAdude]

@goatface1000 Reeled in? How so?

[goatface1000]

@NRAdude You really are being reeled in, don't you realise that?