Mike Miller 1000lb Box squat
Top Comments
All Comments (93)
-
this dude is 185 lbs now.
-
@Friday13thTaurus ,if size is one factor and proportions and skill others,then the last 2 stay constant but only overall size(volume) reduces,theres an example for you.Why would you think differently?
-
@Friday13thTaurus that would be blatantly obvious but the point is that reducing size increases relative strength when everything else stays the same.
-
@Friday13thTaurus no because a baby isnt a mature organism,it doesnt have the nuerological nor muscular developement of an adult. An adult reduced to the size of a baby would have greater relative strength,Ive already explained that to you.
-
@Friday13thTaurus youll find that everyone else with any understanding does think so.Mike miller if he was reduced in size down to a foot high would be far stronger relatively than he is now,thats what Im saying.Its also the reason that triple bodyweight clean and jerks are only found in the very lowest weight classes,supers cant even do double bodyweight.
-
wow. what a great physique this guy has lol
-
@Friday13thTaurus its stronger simply because its smaller,everything thats smaller has greater surface area to volume ratio.Surface area is exactly related to cross sectional area of muscle so that determines strength while volume is size,therefore relative strength goes up as size goes down
-
@wartactics Look up Andrey Malanichev, WR holder RAW, he can see his junk.
-
@kgorilla2 because he doesnt trai for it,single squats are largely about the skill of doing the exercise not great strength,theres a lot of balance there.
-
@billysue2 he cant do one singel one leg squat..... think abaut it....
are you an idiot,the laws of physics mean the lighter lifter will always have the greatest relative strength.Thats why an insect is far stronger relatively than any human.Brainless cunts all over youtube.
billysue2 2 years ago 34
Kirk Karwowski makes him look like a bitch
mqzmcq13 2 years ago 24