Countdown: Worst Person June 25, 2008

And the winner is....Antonin Scalia. Runners up Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Countdown
• Keith
• Olbermann
• Worst
• Person
• Antonin
• Scalia
• Sean
• Hannity
• Bill
• O'Reilly

[immikeurnot]

"Those arms would obviously be what was available in the 1700s..." Moron. Is he transmitting via 1700s technology? No. Does that mean he doesn't have a 1A right to do it?

zzzxxyy: "assault guns"? What's an "assault gun"? I like my ergonomic semi-autos with large-ish magazines because they're effective. My AK doesn't care if it's clean or dirty or even packed with mud. It works every time. That's why we love those kind of guns.

[Ataxicabdriver]

Hey Olbermann, you dip-shit, do you think they had radio, television, the internet, and MSNBC in mind when they wrote the 1st amendment.

Olbermann, how would you feel if the 1st amendment was held in question?

The 2nd amendment guarantees the 1st.

The only clown I see here is Olbermann.

[Beambastic]

I agree with Olbermann on most instances, but not the one about the second amendment. Either Barack Obama has stated that the gentlemen carrying assult rifles to his rallys...have the right to do so.

The right to bare arms goes and constitutes what were arms then (muskets) and what are arms now (handguns and assult rifles). I would rather have a long distant arguement with a person with a hand gun, then a cannon. That is just me though.

[MarshalBannana]

The second amendment was designed exclusively to defend America against the British? You're a dumbass Olbermann. If what you say was true, congress would have immediately amended the 2nd amendment after the revolutionary war ended.

Illegalizing firearms only gives the advantages to criminals. Keep your anti-self defense opinions to yourself you gun-grabbing asshole.

[biollante62]

vaginal belch? oh that is classic my friend!

[gsequel]

You haven't said ANYTHING. Called me some colorful names, but you still haven't proved to me that the framers of the constitution had any clue what devastating effects gunfire would do to american families. Again, legally own a gun? Fine. Keep it and be safe. But there's got to be a limit to automatic weapons floating around the entire country.

[jimmyshakeresq]

People like you don't want to be confused with facts once their mind is made up. I don't think the framers of the Constitution knew the Country would be filled with dipshits like you. I can't help you "get it". Just imagine the future when the only madmen with guns are the government and they order you to be sterilized or take on the mark. What do you fight back with; harsh language? The framers COULD see that. Like I said, facts won't matter to you.

[gsequel]

Help me get it jimmy. Do you think the people who drafted the constitution knew that guns would be the tool of choice for madmen nationwide? Ya think they thought guns would be used to mow down american students at schools? I do not think the gov't should ask for lawfully owned guns, but lets not pretend like Pres Jefferson was hunkering for a tek-9.

[3rdWorldCrusader]

You're right. Olbermann's logic is flawed and he's a fucking dumbass.

[3rdWorldCrusader]

You're wrong.

[mjones1021]

what a douchebag I hope you get hit by a train you bloody vaginal belch

[foxrat123]

At the rate of 30,000 gun deaths in the U.S. per year, it would take more than 3,333 years to equal the number murdered in communist countries, by the governments of these countries.