Science & Human Origins: How accurate are current models used in population genetics?

Ann Gauger is Senior Research Scientist at Biologic Institute. She received her Ph.D. in developmental biology from the University of Washington and was a post-doctoral fellow at Harvard University.

Science & Human Origins (http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.co...), the provocative new book from Discovery Institute Press, boldly addresses some of the most popular evolutionary arguments pertaining to controversial claims that humans and apes are related through common ancestry.

In Science & Human Origins three scientists challenge the claim that undirected natural selection is capable of building a human being. The authors critically assess fossil and genetic evidence that human beings share a common ancestor with apes, and debunk recent claims that the human race could not have started from an original couple.

• Category

  Science & Technology

[ALSPEHEIR]

shutterstock(.)com/pic-862039/­stock-photo-biological-science­-laboratory-at-night.html

[demoskunk]

Lol! Nice fake background to go with the fake scientist. Creationists are so willfully ignorant that they have to resort to lies to support their ignorance.

[LordCreo]

And yet nothing we can 'imagine' is as batshit crazy as "a magic sky daddy did it!"

[5tonyvvvv]

The atheists are willing to imagine anything, create all kinds of complex unobservable chemistry, improbable, ridiculous chemically absurd scenarios and explanations, as long as they can always rule out God! Einstein - "The fanatical atheists are like slaves"

[LordCreo]

Again show me one "top chemist in the world" who supports creationism and rejects evolution.

[5tonyvvvv]

HAHAHA!! Yeah and thats why we cant build a protein today! By natural or unguided processes! Head over to the 2013 origin of life conference and tell the top chemists in the world there are no problems and its all solved! You are delusional! Chemists working on it are only PROVING INTELLIGENT DESIGN! NOT UNGUIDED CHEMICAL PROCESSES!!

Christian de Duve- "There is no sense in which atheism is enforced or established by science"

[LordCreo]

no scientist who understands evolution would claim a protein could be created by unguided chemical processes. That's called Hoyle's fallacy.

[5tonyvvvv]

HAHAHAH! What mechanisms, you dumb delusional moron! Life only comes from life! You mean chemists engineering and manipulating in labs with LOTS OF INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN! Purifying bases and performing all the sequencing! Poor dumb fuck, the more you talk the worse it gets! You could never get a protein to form by unguided chemical processes, forget about a LIVING CELL! And no chemist on earth believes TIME Dun it!

Being delusional is not helping you MORON! :)