Response to Saukko31's response to my "Rare Earth" video
Uploader Comments (spacenie)
Video Responses
All Comments (14)
-
spacenie: Life already exists on Earth, there's no need to tweak anything. We exist as we are because of the present conditions on earth. We have adapted to these conditions, if they change, some of us will die, those of us who fit the changes will survive. Imagine yourself travelling down a street you've never been before, at 200km/h, trying to find an address. Adapt or perish.
-
What do I make of the Big Bang? Frankly, I just don't know, but so far I'm supportive of the idea of the Big Bang/Big Crunch idea. There's a billion explanations, and frankly I just don't know. I'm not about to start completely guessing though. A designer? What does it look like, how did it do it, why did it do it? That brings more questions then answers.
-
If you believe that the universe is infinitely old, what do you make of the Big Bang?
A strong conclusion from the Big Bang (and the 2nd law of thermodynamics) is that the universe did have a beginning and will have a definite end.
It seems more correct to say that the more complex and ordered a system is, the more likelihood it had a Designer.
-
Hm, interesting.
But anyway, the universe could very well be infinitely old. No real way to prove that. But i do believe it to be true.
And you'd be suprised the crazy things that can come from atoms randomly flying around. Like massive stars. Complex things are completely capable of happening without a designer (in fact i think it logically make more sense for something to be natural if its complex)
-
No need for mudslinging. And I find Saukko31 to be pretty cool. Weve even been to the same town in Finland!
Perhaps, but the universe is not infinitely old, is it?
And some things are impossible- at least statically so. And complex, intelligent life arising from atoms flying around randomly is one of those things.
-
zzyzx0788, the great numbers game basically boils down to what we chose to believe. The paradox of evolution takes more time then our solar system has been around, while the creationists need a much younger earth. Who is right? The numbers cannot tell us which is true because we play with them to support our beliefs.
As for the complex things, its hard for me to explain, but it just makes more sense to for complex things to be from natural process then designed process. Humans took thousands of years just to do things we can do now, and its still nothing compared to how complex the world or universe can be on its own. Take Fully grown trees, DNA replication, snowflakes, stars formation, galaxies. Incredibly complex, yet happen naturally all the time.
Idk its hard for me to put into words
zzyzx0788 2 years ago
Sure. I guess it's the same for me, but in a different way. : )
Yes, it's taken people a long time to get to where we are technologically, but at the same time, people are still people.
The Bible, written 2,000 years (and longer) ago, describes people as if it was writing about people living in modern day New York City. I'm referring to how people behave, our struggles and fears, questions about God and life. All of those basic areas of our existence are universal and dont change.
spacenie 2 years ago
spacenie: We haven't explored earth-like planets yet because we don't have the technology in place, thus, it will still be speculation.
Homo Sapiens Sapiens is a successful species here on earth, I predict, we're so successful that if we don't stop ourselves, we'll obliterate ourselves. Because we're so successful, we won't evolve until something happens to our habitat. Hmm...
Orkaney 2 years ago
In our lifetimes, we will not be able to explore all of the universe. Still, we can see all of the many factors which are needed for life to exist in our solar system and presently on earth.
There are many and if any are barely tweaked, then life as we know it would not exist.
spacenie 2 years ago