Lance Armstrong Racing Against Cancer

Lance Armstrong and Nike team up to discuss why Lance has returned to competitive cycling.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• lance armstrong
• cycling
• nike
• cancer
• livestrong
• livestrong.com

[blondie859111]

I just celebrated my one year anniversary as a breast cancer survivor on the day I was a patient at the Lance Armstrong Survivorship Clinic at Dana Farber Cancer Institute. I received such helpful and wonderful care thanks to his generosity. LA is an exceptional human being.

[S2ug]

TDF 2010 Winner- Lance Armstrong....

LIVE FAST LIVESTRONG

[mtorresjrzero]

"Critics" They can say whatever they want.

I don't do what I do, for them. ;]

[hghepo]

Livestrong . com is a business corporation. Don't be confused with livestrong . org , the foundation.

[evanbrockwalter]

Woof

[retr0llz]

Bro, try this

watch?v=wvzDHGLEUyw

It's a nutritional cure to cancer

[TheFrankyboy75]

Do you expect Armstrong to be sentenced to jail? That will never happen with circumstancial evidence.

[musicNsoccer]

@TheFrankyboy75 this isn't a tax court son. It's the court of public opinion. Let me give you a similar case you might not be so familiar with. Over here there's a baseball player named Barry Bonds. He's the best hitter of ALL time, he has the home run record. He's suspected of doping, yet never been proven guilty. However the court of public opinion has convicted him and put an asterisk on his record winning baseball. That's life. In Arm's case there's MUCH more evidence than with Bonds.

[TheFrankyboy75]

@musicNsoccer Do you know how hard it is to condemn somebody on circumstancial evidence? In tax law it is almost impossible so it isn't any easier in criminal law. What you mention as evidence is never, I repeat, NEVER gonna get Lance convicted. You're gonna have to come up with something better - maybe you should do your own investigation.

[musicNsoccer]

@TheFrankyboy75 In a similar vein, it is difficult to condemn Arm Prong since he's best at gaming the doping system, hence no conviction yet. He is as guilty as sin, because of the weight of the circumstantial evidence. 1) Ashenden - an expert analyzed test results, concluded him guilty 2)His employment of dope dr. Ferrari 3)every teammate fingers him as ringleader 4)his employees saw him with dope 5)proven cheater viz a viz his wife. Verdict: Guilty as Sin. Dope Strong my friend!

[TheFrankyboy75]

@musicNsoccer Sorry for late answer. Again I'm not into criminal law but only the danish tax law but if you want my opinion with the little knowledge I have of criminal law I would say that it would be hard to condemn Bin Laden when it comes to 9/11. When I say he's guilty as sin it's because he's admitted so many other acts of terrorism that we would have sufficient evidence to condemn him anyway. The video of Bin Laden admitting 9/11 is probably fake, so it wont hold up.