Upload

This video is unavailable.

ISS Update: Weekly Recap for April 20, 2012

ReelNASA ReelNASA·1,464 videos
56,157

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
11,092
Like     Dislike 1

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like ReelNASA's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike ReelNASA's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add ReelNASA's video to your playlist.

Published on Apr 20, 2012

The International Space Station Weekly Recap for April 16-20, 2012.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (22)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Chuck Norris

    As in Roman Numerals for numbers for example IV is four and 5 is V

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chuck Norris's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Chuck Norris's comment.
    in reply to midstarify (Show the comment)
  • Vas Daniel

    I wish i could travel on spice at least 1 time. :)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vas Daniel's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Vas Daniel's comment.
  • mikejacksonscatflap

    you cant even spell get the fuck off the internet

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mikejacksonscatflap's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mikejacksonscatflap's comment.
    in reply to a44977 (Show the comment)
  • CongletonDirector

    Thomas a Rickhoff... i take my hat off to you... thanks for the information..

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CongletonDirector's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CongletonDirector's comment.
    in reply to ThomasARickhoff (Show the comment)
  • Trevan Michael

    roman numeral for 30.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Trevan Michael's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Trevan Michael's comment.
    in reply to midstarify (Show the comment)
  • midstarify

    What dose "X X X" mean ? 0:14

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate midstarify's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate midstarify's comment.
  • ThomasARickhoff

    The Soyuz has a greater safety record then the Shuttle. The Shuttle must glide to its target and anything that happens in the upper atmosphere can cause it to break apart. The Shuttle also had only one landing attempt. A capsule is more resilient. If the spacecraft comes in on an off-nominal approach it is designed to put itself into a proper reentry attitude (either the nominal or ballistic). As for Mars right now, capsule landings are easier before space planes.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ThomasARickhoff's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ThomasARickhoff's comment.
    in reply to CongletonDirector (Show the comment)
  • CongletonDirector

    Is this method of landing safer then the landing of the Shuttle? It seems to me that relying on a capsule design increases the risk of vehicular failure?? I have read about the Mars Lander 'curiosity' which is just simply the most amazing piece of engineering ever which uses the jets to hover after a series of parachutes... but i bet they would prefer a plane type design to land like the Shuttle did...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CongletonDirector's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CongletonDirector's comment.
    in reply to ThomasARickhoff (Show the comment)
  • ThomasARickhoff

    The Soyuz will undock from the space station and back away to a safe distance. From there the retrorockets will fire which allow the spacecraft to fall out of orbit. The modules of the Soyuz separate. The Decent module (with the crew and cargo) will reenter the atmosphere. Various parachutes will be deployed to slow the capsule down. Right before landing, jets will fire to cushion the impact. They will land in the steppes of Kazakhstan. The crew will then be extracted from the capsule.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ThomasARickhoff's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ThomasARickhoff's comment.
    in reply to CongletonDirector (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later