the Enochian System of John Dee, session 1, section A, part 1
Uploader Comments (benpadiah)
All Comments (32)
-
@zexxx011 It also seems that good spelling doesn't exists.
-
@PhillipOrion No, he was Q. Sir Francis Walsingham was M, and Sir Francis Drake was 007.
-
I have a question... what is the music in the beginning of all your videos?
-
Wasn't John Dee 007?
-
There is so much Enochian material out there, the problem for me at least, is twofold in that ,what material is authentic and correct? and how to make it into a workable system! I love English history, but with the title you have posted, not enough Enochian too much Tudor !start from Elizabeth, and lets get on with it ben!!
-
@InfoRoom Good lord!
IR: such negativity is rife on the internet & I'm sure you can find some that will appreciate such hatred...but I don't.
Peace.
-
@mayanchild Everyone must pay attention to his History for it is the hidden history of the Khazar Jews mascarading and kings. Death to all these people and their children.
-
brilliant video great music
-
.Since your video is about England it seems only fitting that the English language should be spoken correctly.We English do not 'coronate' our kings and queens, we 'crown' them. This ceremony is called a 'coronation'
-
@zexxx011 "I don't think that......." The word daemon originated as being a god in Greek Mythology until it's meaning got twisted. And what is orthodox religion? I didn't mention a term such as that. If this is the reply after a whole month perhaps it would have been better just to leave it. Regarding organised religions, I hope u're not one of those people who sees only what he/she wants to see.
You've made an historically erroneous comment in this piece i.e. that Mary Queen of Scots & the Earl of Bothwell conspired together & murdered MQS then husband Darnely & for this she was imprisoned by Elizabeth.
That unfortunately is just a fine example of well engineered Tudor propaganda, that was debunked long ago.
Altho Darnely's untimely death did work out perfectly for one machiavellian Queen & it wasn't Mary...
Tudor politics, as I'm sure you know, is full of such juicy red herrings ;).
mayanchild 1 year ago 6
@mayanchild heya! Good point. History should not be seen as subjective or open to interpretation, but injested objectively and without bias. The assertion of the murder in question itself may indeed be propaganda left over from 400 years ago, however I do not mean to imply that it was BECAUSE of this murder that MQS was imprisoned by her sister E1. MQS was imprisoned for treason, not murder. If I confused anyone by my inference to that effect, I apologise. Thanks for the catch! PEACE! - Jon
benpadiah 1 year ago
@benpadiah nicely put Jon, thanks for that :).
Just to clarify; when you refer to MQS as E1 'sister' you do not mean this in a literal sense, right?
MQS is so often mistaken for E1 sister, who was of course Mary Tudor (bloody Mary) an entirely different person in every sense of the word. Although MQS & E1 were second cousins connected through the common ancestry of Henry VII.
Amazing how enmeshed royal bloodlines are, kinda helps to explain why so many of them were sociopaths! ;-)
mayanchild 1 year ago 3
@mayanchild yes, again thanks for the catch. I am getting to the age where I am starting to need to look things up to be able to remember them, instead of being able to pull the answers out of my memory alone. I need to watch my "scholarship" in this regard especially, so I am much endebted for your kind points. Thanks again! - Jon
benpadiah 1 year ago