Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Vaclav Klaus: No progress in the climate change debate

Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic and the European Union, speaks at the 2009 International Conference on Climate Change. Klaus argues that global warming "alarmists" are short on data a...  
 
Customize

More From: ReasonTV

Loading...
Play All Stop Autoplaying | Play Next

QuickList(0)

1
Clear | Save

Related Videos

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
86 ratings
Sign in to rate
2,861 views
Flag
close
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
close
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...
Sign in to post a Video Response

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (26)   Options

Loading...
Ihateyoutoube (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Total skepticism towards global warming is bad for the libertarian movement, if you deny it completely you make a fool out of yourself and libertarianism. Obviously I believe in a free market approach to climate change solutions, but I don't deny scientific consensus.
samuils (4 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
There is no Consensus, stop the BS, obviously the the planet is warming and cooling, but it has nothing to do with people.
Ihateyoutoube (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Denying what a majority of scientists have agreed is caused by humanity isn't going to help our cause. There is an unnatural CO2 spike and CO2 has been tied with planetary warming in the past.
samuils (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No rather the opposite, Its the warming in the past that drew the CO2 up, not the other way. Look at it closely.  And I refuse to follow Gore, so he can proffit from his carbon credits, just for the sake of falling behind a party line, when this man made global warming has been proven false. I am against pollution ofcourse, but there re many and better alternatives in the free market, so no need for govt. to dictate my energy source.
karexmaster (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It is not un-natural at all

CO2 has been over 17X higher in the past.
karexmaster (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for Global Warming" - Daily Telegraph.

There isn't even a petition with 500 signitures that states it is human caused
wolfhybred (8 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well said!
air0lann (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Just a detail - Václav Klaus IS NOT a president of the European Union - there´s no such position. He´s the president of Czech republic and this country is currently holding the EU presidency. :-)

Thank you very much for posting.
47f0 (9 months ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
Yeah, nickd, because your individual liberty to drive your Hummer to your next-door-neighbors is sooooo much more important than the fact that we have to kiss ass politically (or start preemptive wars) to get the gas for your Hummer from countries that don't like us very much.

I taught my kids a stupid concept - one that individual libertarians don't like much - freedoms come with responsibilities.
nickd4818 (9 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Actually, I could just walk to my next doors neighbors house. And I drive a Honda. So please, stop with the dramatic generalizations.

So what if somebody has a hummer? If they can afford it whats the problem? We wouldn't have to kiss ass to get more oil if the Spendacrats and their environmentalist handlers would let America develop its own energy resources.

But no, we can't do that. We got to develop technology that doesn't exist yet to free us, as Obama said, from the "tyranny of oil"

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.