Dr. Whelan on MSNBC discussing obese teens at risk
Loading...
Loading...
2,421
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 2:07UK's obesity epidemicby Mediascrape48,840 views
Featured Video
- 1:30BPA and Bears -- www.acsh.orgby ACSHonTV2,452 views
- 3:46Jeff Stier Debates Pop-Tarts and Consumer Choic...by ACSHonTV807 views
- 3:06Jeff Stier discusses CSPI lawsuit against McDon...by ACSHonTV944 views
- 6:12Dr. Elizabeth Whelan discussing children's heal...by ACSHonTV5,523 views
- 4:04Dr. Whelan on Planet in Perilby ACSHonTV1,830 views
- 3:4117 Year old Melissa is 356 lbsby BiggestLoserBattle5,968 views
- 2:37Jeff Stier on MSNBC discussing obese teens at riskby ACSHonTV16,181 views
- 1:53Morbidly Obese Ballerinaby mattsuave6,179,639 views
- 2:32Teens at Risk - Wasting Awayby TMWMedia5,214 views
- 2:00Dr. Elizabeth Whelan Interviewed by Eyewitness ...by ACSHonTV207 views
- 0:41The Onion Movie- Obesityby foxabulous715,534 views
- 9:41NBC Jane Pauley Show "Childhood Obesity"by RockyOnAir18,409 views
- 4:02How Teens Lose Weight and Keep It Off (Weight L...by ExpandedBooks49,721 views
- 2:00Overeating Outby CBSNewsOnline6,969 views
- 4:50Girls And Early Pubertyby AsamoPower197,486 views
- 3:49Excessive Warning Labelsby ACSHonTV979 views
- 2:15The Secret Life of the Obese Teenby iknowaVampire1,040 views
- 1:51Obesity in the USAby HealthFreakUSA81,824 views
- 9:09Teen Obesityby deanage2822,768 views
Everyone gets paid to do a job, so that's not the criteria. The difference is between obsessional fanatics on a mission to 'save' everyone, even if it means twisting data, and scientists treating data as they should. Debating this is like debating religion, but a few sham scare examples, many forgotten: prohibition (liquor caused Everything), flouride, strontium 90, cranberries, apples (Alar), DDT, PCBs, second-hand smoke, Y2K, Global Cooling (1975), warming (now), CO2 and plastics. All manias.
roberto1942 2 years ago
Research from looney fad-scare environmentalists organizations? LOL Not sure what you're talking about but that sounds funny. Well I'd agree that it's difficult to get truly unbiased information. The American Council on Science is quite biased. Anytime your paycheck depends on the outcome of a study and not just the conclusion of a study, it is not science and it's not information I'd trust. There's a lot of bullshit out there, you just have to make up your own mind.
winstonsmith00 2 years ago
I would sooner have the research come from industry or private foundations rather than loony fad-scare environmentalist organizations, who only exist to create fear, usually by exagerration or lies.
When the lies are disproved, these characters just move on to the next scare.
roberto1942 2 years ago
Yup they're paid liars for industry. They're pretty bad. Samantha from The Daily Show did an interview with them about organic gardening which made it apparent where they get their money, it was funny as hell.
winstonsmith00 2 years ago
I love the American Council on Science and Health! OMG! So FAAAAIR.... so BALENCEDDDD
zgress 2 years ago
that's sad
littlemissperfect166 3 years ago