Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
thanks man, I actually have to wrap up this study about plate tectonics vs expanding earth.......I am into the history of mankind and his migration out of Africa, and wish to concentrate on that. This expanding earth hypothisis, I find has been around a long time, even Darwin mentioned it. But it is a little interesting...........Damn, there's too much thinking going on in the world....lol
Beliefs has nothing to do with science. Forget the beliefs and show me the evidences. When I look at the evidences that should support subduction I only see evidences for the opposite motion: a mantle wedge metasomatizing oceanic crust. And evidently, it does imply no recycling of oceanic crust, thus global surface increase and global growth.
One inherent flaw with this concept is that the continents "drift". Many times we see the eastern part of South America once being up next to the west of Africa. It seems to fit.
However, the continents are a part of their local tectonic plate. If South America could "drift" away from west Africa what about the rest of the tectonic plate upon which it sits? The tectonic plates don't drift. They are solidly in place amongst the other tectonic plates.
I guess this is related to Herndon. But Herndon hypothesis is horribly geocentric. But fact is that Earth is not the unique celestial body to grow. Many moons do, even tiny moons like enceladus (250 km in radius).
Auch Erdbeben können als Abbruch von Krustenmasse am inneren Krustenrand erklärt werden. Beim Tsunamibeben am 26.12.2004 wurde gesagt, daß die Tageslänge sich hierdurch um 6,8 Mikrosekunden verkürzt haben soll. Nach dem Modell sind hierfür 3500km³ Kruste abgebrochen und ca. 3ookm in die Tiefe gestürzt Dort ist dann die Gasdichte mit der Gesteinsdichte identisch. Die hierdurch verursachte Trägheitsmomentänderung entspricht den 6,8 mys.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Forget the beliefs and show me the evidences. When I look at the evidences that should support subduction I only see evidences for the opposite motion: a mantle wedge metasomatizing oceanic crust. And evidently, it does imply no recycling of oceanic crust, thus global surface increase and global growth.
However, the continents are a part of their local tectonic plate. If South America could "drift" away from west Africa what about the rest of the tectonic plate upon which it sits? The tectonic plates don't drift. They are solidly in place amongst the other tectonic plates.
The continents are just the part we see.