Media Caught Lying, Version2

I stumbled on a stunning disconnect between the major media version of election coverage and candidate appearance trends on the internet. The Mainstream Media seems to have largely ignored something major on the web.
This version corrects a minor error in the first version. Note: This video has attracted a lot of attention from hater-trolls so I may block anyone that comes here to make trouble. All respectful and intelligent discussion is welcome.

• Category

  News & Politics

[rob dendle]

facebook.com/groups/mainstream­lies/

[shawso7]

Nicely put. History has proven such & is repeating itself. With this in mind the frog will continue to boil until its dead.

Success & Peace to you & watch your 6.

[minivanjack]

Such a wide scale coordinated revolt is unlikely. Our tyranny is slow and patient. It creeps up on us. A new tax here, a new regulation there. When do you revolt? We will disagree. Rome fell and so will all other systems based on un-backed or debased currency and uncontrolled debt. In those regimes revolution is not even be necessary. They fail. Always.

[shawso7]

UNIVERSAL POINT of NO RETURN?

Bravo & I submit that unless there's collaboration between "patriots" as to a MUTUALLY agreed "Point of No Return" then the shear variety of breaking points for different people will simply result in an uncoordinated response to tyranny. Remember, what makes one man snap, may be tolerated others.

Certainly some "patriots" have considered such issues, but a minority. Thus govt will easily crush pockets of resistance since they'll fail to take action simultaneously.

[minivanjack]

Decide now how much control you will accept. How many freedoms, and rights you will give up before acting to defend them. How much of your property and your family's safety you will allow to be taken before admitting "the system" is corrupt and toxic. Decide what your limit is. Then make a plan to act. If we don't do this we are slaves.

[shawso7]

OATH KEEPERS

Fortunately you're correct about a lot of soldiers how are enlightened & would refuse to disarm Americans. Sadly though the US has a few written agreements already in place that will allow foreign troops to control US streets.

As for paying soldiers keep in mind there's already a number of "Executive Orders" & laws in place that allows govt to seize all resources (food,etc) from citizens during an "emergency" for military use. Obviously all such laws or orders are unConstitutional.

[minivanjack]

It's pretty hard to institute martial law when your currency collapses and you can't pay the soldiers. And luckily, there are a lot of soldiers who are enlightened enough to refuse to turn arms against innocent Americans.

[shawso7]

CRUMBLE LIKE DUST

I agree with your statement. So much so that I know for a fact that taking such action would bring the system down. It'll never happen due to the majority's dependence on this system, but you are correct in your theory. All this said, we recognize that IF such action was taken & the system collapsed there is no doubt that intiailly it would lead to anarchy due to the breakdown of civil services & govt would initate martial law. That in turn would lead to physical confrontation.

[minivanjack]

A revolution can happen many ways. If individuals simply, each in their own ways, move toward self-sufficiency and denial of toxic currencies and debt the "matrix" will crumble like dust, fast or slow, its up to us. Organization is nice, but it is not necessary.

[shawso7]

BAN

1.forbid or stop something officially or legally so that it cannot be done, used, or somebody from doing something or going somewhere.

Right to bear arms (guns/weapons) is currently banned in the form of "regulation" today. All of which are illegal due to their unConstitutionality.

Sadly, sheeple, including NRA & other organizations have allowed Americans to slide down the slippery slope of "regulation" since 1934. They've been brainwashed into thinking no regulation at all is extreme.

Peace