mathematics amazing

64=65 ?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• mathematic
• math
• amazing
• intelligent
• ilginç
• matematik
• 64
• 65
• mathematics

[revison97]

that is just parallelogram .It look like rectangle but angles are not right.

and 64/13= 4,(923076) so angles are not so different as in rectangle

[pafeuvip]

@speng120 that's right,

Thales' theorem :)

[speng120]

Put simply looking at the square, the orange and blue shapes have the slope of 2 across for 5 up whereas the red and green shapes have slope 8 across for 3 up. 5/2 is not 8/3 henceforth impossible

[andreirocks1992]

just as everyone pointed out, in one part of the figure, the diagonal goes 2.5 squares right and for 1 square up, and in another part, it goes 3 right for 1 up, therefore it's not the same line

[Typho0n86]

middle bit have overlap, not a math trick, just an illusion

[leanpower]

This is a visual trick the angle of the two inclines is not the same one is 2/5 and one is 3/8 so the diagonals are not a straight line and creat a ramboid whose surface area is equal to one.. Therefore 8x8 is not equal to the 5x13.

[raydredX]

@SittingOnEdgeman Would you say that the derivative OF A FUNCTION can be not a function? I'm curious I disagree and I think I could prove it but I may be missing something.

[raydredX]

@menthol5 Derivatives cannot be greater than one?....

[raydredX]

0:22 The square's sides don't coincide exactly. Therefore you can't simply do 5*13. You can also see that there's a lil bit missing. On top of the resulting "rectangle". The area of that little missing part is 1.

[8RyuRyu8]

Math geeks in our presence ><