Strobel Under Fire - Part 1 of a Four-Part Series
Loading...
Uploader Comments (TruthSurge)
Video Responses
All Comments (189)
-
@jimmo42 Thanks for answering, i'm intrigued so feel free to PM me if you want/need more space.. I love the tao de ching and when i was younger i described myself as a "philosophical taoist" but it is not based on reality and although it contains wisdom it is not intrinsically wise. Please don't start on quantum entanglement as a justification for the supernatural but do tell me if you believe in a personal god and if you don't why do you bother with religion? Why "he"? for instance
-
@1empathy I certainly disagree that it is is "just clever word play". There are many excellent lessons there no matter what your beliefs. (religious or not) I don't take my pantheism much past the belief that *if* there is a god, he is the same as the universe and that everything is connected in some way. (See "quantum entanglement")
-
Lao tzu reads well but if you accept reality (i do, you may not) then it is just clever word play. A pantheist does not believe in a personal god, so no salvation, no afterlife, no eternal justice etc, why bother? I'm not religious as they all make ridiculous and unfounded claims and i couldn't choose one over another.
-
None of the above. ;-)
The closest I thing to anything that has a name is that I might call myself a taoist pantheist. However, as with many things, the more you try to define it, the further you get from what you are trying to describe.
-
@jimmo42 Your post suggests you are not a christian. What religion are you?
-
Lee strobel, puttting the "ass" in assertions.
6:58
Strobel Under Fire - Part 2 of a Four-Part Seriesby TruthSurge2,116 views- 6:40
Strobel Under Fire - Part 4 of a Four-Part Seriesby TruthSurge1,519 views
- 6:22
Strobel Under Fire - Part 3 of a Four-Part Seriesby TruthSurge1,649 views
- 8:44
Inventing Jesus - Part 1by TruthSurge2,564 views
- 6:19
100 % Proof that Islam is MAN-MADE!!!by ergdf54g45g5h76j8kug7,586 views
- 1:33
John Piper - Can We Trust The 66 Books Of The Bible?by TheGospelCoalition12,381 views
- 10:00
Misquoting Jesus, Stanford Lecture, How Bible Got Tainted 9/10by TruthAboutBible28,888 views
- 0:59
Were the Gospel writers eyewitnesses?by johnankerberg2,665 views
- 10:02
101 Bible Contradictions Cleared! (Part 2)by positron662,787 views
- 44:55
What Are People Saying about Jesus?by rfvidz695 views
- 9:34
Dating the New Testament (an overview using Mark as example) part 2by TruthSurge779 views
- 5:43
Biblion: The Mystery of the Bible Originsby prospermedia409 views
- 1:17
What is your opinion Dr. Wright, of the conclusions reached by the Jesus Seminar?by johnankerberg4,189 views
- 9:52
The Lost Gospels [1/9]by easeen225,931 views
- 4:37
Is Jesus the Jewish Messiah? (1 of 2) Debate - Dr. Michael Brown vs Shmuley Boteachby toddtyszka314,251 views
- 9:57
Biblical Contradictions 2by ProfMTH11,078 views
- 7:01
Biblical Errors, Contradictions and Fallacies (Part 4 of 8)by klomckin8,702 views
- 8:42
Biblical Errors, Contradictions & Fallacies (Part 8 of 8)by klomckin7,835 views
- 5:31
William Lane Craig on John Dominic Crossanby drcraigvideos9,075 views
- 10:02
The Real Jesus: Conclusion (10 of 10)by jcr4runner15,087 views
All true corrections of historical errors on the part of the author(s) of the mentioned passages. But the Bible is not supposed to be seen as a 100% accurate historical document. Suppose I write a book on the character and nature of Abraham Lincoln. And all of my information is correct on him as a noble person. Knowing this purpose in my writing, would you get hung up if I mistakenly (not purposefully) said he was the 36th president and Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated him in his home?
perichoresis7 1 month ago
@perichoresis7 of course I would. Even moreso than "Daniel"'s errors. He didn't have databases and an Internet. You do. :)
TruthSurge 1 month ago
@TruthSurge But historical accuracy was not my focus. If the motive of the text is known, it should be read in that mindset.
perichoresis7 1 month ago
@perichoresis7 You cannot always KNOW the intent and especially without knowing a LOT about where Mark (the first gospel) got his info from and what was going on in his day, when he wrote, etc. Who he was and was not. etc. Lots of learning and puzzle fitting b4 you could say you knew Mark's intent. As for history, if almost every detail of the gospel comes from OT stories/passages and Greek mythology, then it's not simply historically inacccurate. It's fiction.
TruthSurge 1 month ago