Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Clinton vs. Bush in 1992 Debate

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
739,492
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 19, 2007

Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush answer a question on the recession during the second presidential debate of 1992.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • r.i.p sweet Bush

  • RIP Bush

see all

All Comments (3,766)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Lmfao at the stupid bitch asking the question. Jesus Christ.

  • @rb208 source? Also, how much tax can you even afford if you're earning around 30k.

    Say you earn 30k a year and pay 15% which leaves you with 25.5k

    How is somebody meant to live of that especially if they have a family. Face it, taxes are harder for people with less money. Is it really a crime helping people out. The right make it seem like charity's worst thing in the world. Personally, my parents raised me better.

  • @rza1m sorry by average i meant bottom 47%, slightly off. and no, that is from USA Today, a left-leaning paper.....

  • unfortunately this dumbass who asked the question doesn't know the simple difference between national debt and personal financial difficulty. she is representative of the american public who doesn't know shit about their own government and most of the time their own situations. educate yourself. on another note, props to clinton, thats how you debate!

  • @rb208 No, that's untrue. Are you getting this from Fox News or something.

  • @chasnaSESTRA He's alive!!! Why is everyone saying he's dead?

  • @rza1m the average american pays 0% income tax....

  • @rza1m But what is going on now is the same thing to a lesser degree, no? TO say "that group pay 10%, and that group who makes more pays 35%" is illegal. The 35% bracket is perhaps the 1%, and have no protection from the class envy thaty ou liberals constantly stoke in the 99%. Your party is illegal, immoral and in November, out of power.

  • @calimar28 You are incredibly ignorant. No on is proposing raising the taxes of the highest earners to 100%, that is stupid. We just want exactly what you ask for, equal pay. Currently high earners are paying much less than the average person which i why people are so angry.

  • @rza1m Because nobody should pay a different percentage than someone else. Its unequal protection under the law. A politician can promise 99% he will cut their taxes to zero, if they vote for him, and raise the 1%'s taxes to 100%. So the 1% has no protection from the 99, you see? He is using the 1%'s money to buy the votes of the 99%, which is corrupt. It's "majority rule". Lets have a vote on if blacks should be deported to Africa. You wouldnt like majority rule

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more