SUPER-STICKY-NANO-THERMITE RED CHIPS.

MARK ROBERTS debates richard gage about thermite red chips.
UPDATE!
911truther niels harrit paid muslims so he could "prove" 911 was an inside job!
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17288-crap-paper-accepted-by-journal.html

"This is to inform you that your submitted article has been accepted for publication after peer-reviewing process in TOISCIJ. I would be highly grateful to you if you please fill and sign the attached fee form and covering letter and send them back via email as soon as possible to avoid further delay in publication.

The publication fee was $800, to be sent to a PO Box in the United Arab Emirates."

THE TWOOFERS FAIL AGAIN!

here is an English article about the latest prof. Jones's paper

http://11-settembre.blogspot.com/2009/04/active-thermitic-material-claimed-in...

whats in paint chips?
http://www.rustrustler.com/

NIELS HARRIT'S nano-thermite theory is truly pathetic
first he claims wtc 7 fell in 6.5 seconds
which is pure bullshit, the collapse started when the east penthouse fell and took 16 seconds, even dylan avery and steven jones admit this now.
niels claiming 6.5 seconds after researching 911 for 71/2 years is inexcusable, very stupid.
then he claims 10-100 tonnes of 'nano'-thermite were placed throughout the buildings, undetected!, lol.
that is batshit crazy!
to think office workers in the towers ignored thermite charges on the perimeter columns and said nothing to anyone is a vile insult to all the people who worked in the towers.
when the towers collapse there is not a hint of light from the tonnes of nano-thermite which would burn brighter then a arc welder and no charges are heard either and after the collapses there was tons of office paper fluttering in the sky over manhatten that was not even shredded or burnt
survivers in the 7th floor stairwell in wtc1 were not burnt and did not report demo charges going off. all of which proves there was no 'nano-thermite' explosive demolition, none,zero,zilch.

his only evidence are tiny red/grey chips that look like paint chips.

NIELS HARRITS IS TOO STUPID TO REALISE HOW STUPID HE REALLY IS!

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• ksm
• gitmo
• guilty
• colorado
• fabled
• enemies
• wearechange.
• alex
• jones
• loose
• change
• truthers
• 911
• conspiracy
• osama
• bin
• laden
• ron
• paul
• inside
• job
• paranoid
• delusional
• 9/11
• dylan
• avery
• barry
• jennings
• steven
• st911truth
• wtc
• building
• muslims
• tv
• fakery
• hitler
• bush
• retards
• architects
• truth
• movement
• nwo
• illuminate
• schizophrenics
• no
• planes
• shill
• stupidity
• jim
• fetzer
• richard
• gage
• nist
• report
• ae911truth
• final
• michelle
• malkin
• obama
• supporters
• john
• mccain
• fdny
• dnc
• sean
• fitzgerald
• father

[DTD110865]

@primrod

That "journal" was a sham, and he paid some Arabs $800 to make it look like it was a peer revirwed journal.

[DTD110865]

@primrod

See for yourself:

/watch?v=q5IWll8J1wU

[MrRexquando]

Why does Richard always hide Danny Jowenko's statements that WTC1-2 could not have been controlled demolition?

Troother hiding the truth? watch?v=k3wwdI0XawI

[primrod]

warlord2080 quote: “Since Edgar and Thomas is saying that scientist and engineers believe that the steel melted(which is wrong to suggest this and no one claims_ it got that hot) it really points out a straw-man.” That is why I posted several sources showing you just how wrong you are concerning your quote above. I don’t believe the media’s account that office fires melted steel. This is what was told by our reliable media, I have seen this said just last year. It’s sad, really.

[primrod]

“She says it has nothing to do with chemical physics and therefore she's unqualified to judge it as peer review.” Remember when you asked me to provide a source when I said “she said outside her field of experience.” You asked me for a source or I would be deemed a liar, ☺ The paper absolutely deals with chemical physics and physical chemistry. Look up her backround, she is very qualified. This shows you have done little research concerning this issue.

[primrod]

“118 Witnesses: The Firefighter's Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers" Prof. Graeme MacQueen”. You try to discredit it by saying Mr. MacQueen is not an architect or engineer. This is another logical fallacy, it’s an ad hominen. Unless of coarse you can show me why the paper is false do to Prof. MacQueen lacking architecture and engineering credentials. Yet you take the word of a tour guide concerning chemical physics/physical chemistry.